These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406683)

  • 1. Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.
    Kapnoula EC; Winn MB; Kong EJ; Edwards J; McMurray B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1594-1611. PubMed ID: 28406683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left premotor cortex and allophonic speech perception in dyslexia: a PET study.
    Dufor O; Serniclaes W; Sprenger-Charolles L; Démonet JF
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 19457391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Ou J; Yu ACL; Xiang M
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Mar; 45(3):e12948. PubMed ID: 33682211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Idiosyncratic use of bottom-up and top-down information leads to differences in speech perception flexibility: Converging evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking.
    Kapnoula EC; McMurray B
    Brain Lang; 2021 Dec; 223():105031. PubMed ID: 34628259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
    MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Füllgrabe C; Eccles R; van der Linde J; Panebianco C; Fels J; Ljung R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
    Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 26404530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.
    Kapnoula EC; Edwards J; McMurray B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Apr; 47(4):578-595. PubMed ID: 33983791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Errors on a Speech-in-Babble Sentence Recognition Test Reveal Individual Differences in Acoustic Phonetic Perception and Babble Misallocations.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):673-690. PubMed ID: 33928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive basis of individual differences in speech perception, production and representations: The role of domain general attentional switching.
    Ou J; Law SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):945-963. PubMed ID: 28144832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge-based and signal-based cues are weighted flexibly during spoken language comprehension.
    Kaufeld G; Ravenschlag A; Meyer AS; Martin AE; Bosker HR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):549-562. PubMed ID: 31343252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A graph-theoretic approach to identifying acoustic cues for speech sound categorization.
    Crinnion AM; Malmskog B; Toscano JC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1104-1125. PubMed ID: 32671571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between individual differences in speech processing and cognitive functions.
    Ou J; Law SP; Fung R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1725-32. PubMed ID: 25917143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual Differences in Distributional Learning for Speech: What's Ideal for Ideal Observers?
    Theodore RM; Monto NR; Graham S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 31841364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach.
    Ryskin RA; Benjamin AS; Tullis J; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):898-915. PubMed ID: 26214163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in mixing costs relate to general executive functioning.
    Smith LL; Banich MT; Friedman NP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 29985039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in Working Memory Capacity Affect Online Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Nitsan G; Wingfield A; Lavie L; Ben-David BM
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519839624. PubMed ID: 31010398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Referential context and executive functioning influence children's resolution of syntactic ambiguity.
    Qi Z; Love J; Fisher C; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1922-1947. PubMed ID: 32584080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.