These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406683)

  • 21. Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech.
    McLaughlin DJ; Baese-Berk MM; Bent T; Borrie SA; Van Engen KJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1559-1570. PubMed ID: 29740795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do individual differences in lexical reliance reflect states or traits?
    Giovannone N; Theodore RM
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105320. PubMed ID: 36442381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual differences in updating are not related to reasoning ability and working memory capacity.
    Frischkorn GT; von Bastian CC; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jun; 151(6):1341-1357. PubMed ID: 35201837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Executive control influences linguistic representations.
    Lev-Ari S; Keysar B
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):247-63. PubMed ID: 23928859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring individual differences in native phonetic perception and their link to nonnative phonetic perception.
    Honda CT; Clayards M; Baum SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Apr; 50(4):370-394. PubMed ID: 38300566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neural substrates of Chinese lexical production: The role of domain-general cognitive functions.
    Tao L; Zhu M; Cai Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107354. PubMed ID: 31972230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resisting attraction: Individual differences in executive control are associated with subject-verb agreement errors in production.
    Veenstra A; Antoniou K; Katsos N; Kissine M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1242-1253. PubMed ID: 29672116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The time-course of speech perception revealed by temporally-sensitive neural measures.
    Getz LM; Toscano JC
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2021 Mar; 12(2):e1541. PubMed ID: 32767836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.
    Xie Z; Maddox WT; Knopik VS; McGeary JE; Chandrasekaran B
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 67():121-31. PubMed ID: 25497692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true deficit?
    Hazan V; Messaoud-Galusi S; Rosen S; Nouwens S; Shakespeare B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1510-29. PubMed ID: 19635940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Categorical phoneme labeling in children with dyslexia does not depend on stimulus duration.
    O'Brien GE; McCloy DR; Yeatman JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):245. PubMed ID: 31370631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Moving away from deficiency models: Gradiency in bilingual speech categorization.
    Kutlu E; Chiu S; McMurray B
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1033825. PubMed ID: 36507048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working memory predicts semantic comprehension in dichotic listening in older adults.
    James PJ; Krishnan S; Aydelott J
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24955886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Swedish Hayling task, and its relation to working memory, verbal ability, and speech-recognition-in-noise.
    Stenbäck V; Hällgren M; Lyxell B; Larsby B
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 25819210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual differences in musical training and executive functions: A latent variable approach.
    Okada BM; Slevc LR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1076-1092. PubMed ID: 29752659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inconsistency in perspective-taking during comprehension.
    Luce K; Almor A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2351-2362. PubMed ID: 37369976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Weighting of cues to categorization of song versus speech in tone-language and non-tone-language speakers.
    Kachlicka M; Patel AD; Liu F; Tierney A
    Cognition; 2024 May; 246():105757. PubMed ID: 38442588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual differences in speakers' perspective taking: the roles of executive control and working memory.
    Wardlow L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Aug; 20(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 23408369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.