These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406685)

  • 1. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict learned control over attentional capture.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1912-1924. PubMed ID: 28406685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: A microanalytic-macroanalytic investigation of individual differences in goal activation and maintenance.
    Meier ME; Smeekens BA; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 28639800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual selective attention is equally functional for individuals with low and high working memory capacity: evidence from accuracy and eye movements.
    Mall JT; Morey CC; Wolff MJ; Lehnert F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1998-2014. PubMed ID: 24402698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory capacity, controlled attention and aiming performance under pressure.
    Wood G; Vine SJ; Wilson MR
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):510-7. PubMed ID: 26021749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Gulbinaite R; Johnson A; de Jong R; Morey CC; van Rijn H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():197-206. PubMed ID: 24878830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the relation between working memory capacity and the antisaccade task.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK; Miller AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1420-1447. PubMed ID: 34516206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction.
    Broadway JM; Engle RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21470583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 31236897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1282-1311. PubMed ID: 28108977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory capacity and sustained attention: A cognitive-energetic perspective.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):77-103. PubMed ID: 30998072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.