These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406685)

  • 21. Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.
    Miller AL; Unsworth N
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1149-1163. PubMed ID: 29845592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Individual differences in working-memory capacity and task resumption following interruptions.
    Foroughi CK; Werner NE; McKendrick R; Cades DM; Boehm-Davis DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1480-8. PubMed ID: 26882286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of working memory capacity and lapses of attention for variation in error monitoring.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 35426070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
    Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Focusing on attention: the effects of working memory capacity and load on selective attention.
    Ahmed L; de Fockert JW
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43101. PubMed ID: 22952636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
    Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Working memory contents revive the neglected, but suppress the inhibited.
    Han SW
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():116-21. PubMed ID: 26355831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Working memory capacity and recall from long-term memory: Examining the influences of encoding strategies, study time allocation, search efficiency, and monitoring abilities.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variation in the use of cues to guide visual working memory.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1652-1665. PubMed ID: 28547679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distraction of eye-hand coordination varies with working memory capacity.
    Domkin D; Sörqvist P; Richter HO
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 23406167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.
    Chow M; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 25604642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):748-759. PubMed ID: 22774858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.
    Sörqvist P; Marsh JE; Nöstl A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 23479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Working Memory-Driven Attention in Real-World Search.
    Jung S; Yoon Y; Han SW
    Perception; 2018 Sep; 47(9):966-975. PubMed ID: 30058444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.