These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28406690)

  • 1. The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms with varied relationships to face recognition.
    Rezlescu C; Susilo T; Wilmer JB; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1961-1973. PubMed ID: 28406690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When less is more: Impact of face processing ability on recognition of visually degraded faces.
    Royer J; Blais C; Gosselin F; Duncan J; Fiset D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1179-83. PubMed ID: 26168140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in adaptive norm-based coding and holistic coding are associated yet each contributes uniquely to unfamiliar face recognition ability.
    Engfors LM; Jeffery L; Gignac GE; Palermo R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):281-293. PubMed ID: 27819453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability.
    DeGutis J; Wilmer J; Mercado RJ; Cohan S
    Cognition; 2013 Jan; 126(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 23084178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limited evidence of individual differences in holistic processing in different versions of the part-whole paradigm.
    Sunday MA; Richler JJ; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1453-1465. PubMed ID: 28361393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different measures of holistic face processing tap into distinct but partially overlapping mechanisms.
    Boutet I; Nelson EA; Watier N; Cousineau D; Béland S; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2905-2923. PubMed ID: 34180032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revealing the mechanisms of human face perception using dynamic apertures.
    Murphy J; Cook R
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():25-35. PubMed ID: 28803219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adults' Markers of Face Processing Are Present at Age 6 and Are Interconnected Along Development.
    Mardo E; Avidan G; Hadad BS
    Perception; 2018; 47(10-11):1002-1028. PubMed ID: 30217135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal composite face effects in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Biotti F; Wu E; Yang H; Jiahui G; Duchaine B; Cook R
    Cortex; 2017 Oct; 95():63-76. PubMed ID: 28850918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Qualitative Impairment in Face Perception in Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence from a Reduced Face Inversion Effect.
    Lavallée MM; Gandini D; Rouleau I; Vallet GT; Joannette M; Kergoat MJ; Busigny T; Rossion B; Joubert S
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 51(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 26967217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociated neural basis of two behavioral hallmarks of holistic face processing: The whole-part effect and composite-face effect.
    Li J; Huang L; Song Y; Liu J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():52-60. PubMed ID: 28552781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlations between holistic processing, Autism quotient, extraversion, and experience and the own-gender bias in face recognition.
    Morgan M; Hills PJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0209530. PubMed ID: 31276470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of experience-based perceptual learning in the face inversion effect.
    Civile C; Obhi SS; McLaren IPL
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():84-88. PubMed ID: 29608937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Holistic processing of static and moving faces.
    Zhao M; Bülthoff I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1020-1035. PubMed ID: 28191990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.
    Gerlach C; Starrfelt R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1365-1372. PubMed ID: 29560562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans.
    Brecht KF; Wagener L; Ostojić L; Clayton NS; Nieder A
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Dec; 203(12):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28905251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects.
    Eng ZHD; Yick YY; Guo Y; Xu H; Reiner M; Cham TJ; Chen SHA
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():78-85. PubMed ID: 28687329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. General and specific factors in the processing of faces.
    Verhallen RJ; Bosten JM; Goodbourn PT; Lawrance-Owen AJ; Bargary G; Mollon JD
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():217-227. PubMed ID: 28077292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face processing skills predict faithfulness of portraits drawn by novices.
    Devue C; Grimshaw GM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2208-2214. PubMed ID: 29450791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. General object recognition is specific: Evidence from novel and familiar objects.
    Richler JJ; Wilmer JB; Gauthier I
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():42-55. PubMed ID: 28554084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.