324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28407084)
1. Comparative analysis of de novo assemblers for variation discovery in personal genomes.
Tian S; Yan H; Klee EW; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):893-904. PubMed ID: 28407084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
Tian S; Yan H; Neuhauser C; Slager SL
BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):703. PubMed ID: 27590916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust identification of deletions in exome and genome sequence data based on clustering of Mendelian errors.
Manheimer KB; Patel N; Richter F; Gorham J; Tai AC; Homsy J; Boskovski MT; Parfenov M; Goldmuntz E; Chung WK; Brueckner M; Tristani-Firouzi M; Srivastava D; Seidman JG; Seidman CE; Gelb BD; Sharp AJ
Hum Mutat; 2018 Jun; 39(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29527824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications.
Rimmer A; Phan H; Mathieson I; Iqbal Z; Twigg SRF; ; Wilkie AOM; McVean G; Lunter G
Nat Genet; 2014 Aug; 46(8):912-918. PubMed ID: 25017105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data.
Fang H; Wu Y; Narzisi G; O'Rawe JA; Barrón LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Iossifov I; Schatz MC; Lyon GJ
Genome Med; 2014; 6(10):89. PubMed ID: 25426171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State-of-the-art genome inference in the human MHC.
Dilthey AT
Int J Biochem Cell Biol; 2021 Feb; 131():105882. PubMed ID: 33189874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep whole-genome sequencing of 90 Han Chinese genomes.
Lan T; Lin H; Zhu W; Laurent TCAM; Yang M; Liu X; Wang J; Wang J; Yang H; Xu X; Guo X
Gigascience; 2017 Sep; 6(9):1-7. PubMed ID: 28938720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic dissection of biases in whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing reveals major determinants of coding sequence coverage.
Barbitoff YA; Polev DE; Glotov AS; Serebryakova EA; Shcherbakova IV; Kiselev AM; Kostareva AA; Glotov OS; Predeus AV
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2057. PubMed ID: 32029882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. JWES: a new pipeline for whole genome/exome sequence data processing, management, and gene-variant discovery, annotation, prediction, and genotyping.
Ahmed Z; Renart EG; Mishra D; Zeeshan S
FEBS Open Bio; 2021 Sep; 11(9):2441-2452. PubMed ID: 34370400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using de novo assembly to identify structural variation of eight complex immune system gene regions.
Zhang JY; Roberts H; Flores DSC; Cutler AJ; Brown AC; Whalley JP; Mielczarek O; Buck D; Lockstone H; Xella B; Oliver K; Corton C; Betteridge E; Bashford-Rogers R; Knight JC; Todd JA; Band G
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009254. PubMed ID: 34343164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ALPHLARD: a Bayesian method for analyzing HLA genes from whole genome sequence data.
Hayashi S; Yamaguchi R; Mizuno S; Komura M; Miyano S; Nakagawa H; Imoto S
BMC Genomics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 30384854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring single-sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole-genome de novo assembly.
Li H
Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 28(14):1838-44. PubMed ID: 22569178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NovoGraph: Human genome graph construction from multiple long-read
Biederstedt E; Oliver JC; Hansen NF; Jajoo A; Dunn N; Olson A; Busby B; Dilthey AT
F1000Res; 2018; 7():1391. PubMed ID: 30613392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants.
Belkadi A; Bolze A; Itan Y; Cobat A; Vincent QB; Antipenko A; Shang L; Boisson B; Casanova JL; Abel L
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(17):5473-8. PubMed ID: 25827230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-genome sequencing offers additional but limited clinical utility compared with reanalysis of whole-exome sequencing.
Alfares A; Aloraini T; Subaie LA; Alissa A; Qudsi AA; Alahmad A; Mutairi FA; Alswaid A; Alothaim A; Eyaid W; Albalwi M; Alturki S; Alfadhel M
Genet Med; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1328-1333. PubMed ID: 29565419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficient and flexible Integration of variant characteristics in rare variant association studies using integrated nested Laplace approximation.
Susak H; Serra-Saurina L; Demidov G; Rabionet R; Domènech L; Bosio M; Muyas F; Estivill X; Escaramís G; Ossowski S
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1007784. PubMed ID: 33606672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of variant interference on de novo assembly for viral deep sequencing.
Castro CJ; Marine RL; Ramos E; Ng TFF
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):421. PubMed ID: 32571214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DeNovoCNN: a deep learning approach to de novo variant calling in next generation sequencing data.
Khazeeva G; Sablauskas K; van der Sanden B; Steyaert W; Kwint M; Rots D; Hinne M; van Gerven M; Yntema H; Vissers L; Gilissen C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Sep; 50(17):e97. PubMed ID: 35713566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
