These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2840712)

  • 1. Computed tomography, ultrasonography and plain radiography in the detection of foreign bodies in pork muscle tissue.
    Torfing KF; Teisen HG; Skjødt T
    Rofo; 1988 Jul; 149(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 2840712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography.
    Ginsburg MJ; Ellis GL; Flom LL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1990 Jun; 19(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 2188542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study.
    Oikarinen KS; Nieminen TM; Mäkäräinen H; Pyhtinen J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 22(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 8320449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do we really need plain and soft-tissue radiographies to detect radiolucent foreign bodies in the ED?
    Turkcuer I; Atilla R; Topacoglu H; Yanturali S; Kiyan S; Kabakci N; Bozkurt S; Cevik AA
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Nov; 24(7):763-8. PubMed ID: 17098094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography.
    Aras MH; Miloglu O; Barutcugil C; Kantarci M; Ozcan E; Harorli A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 20100917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
    Javadrashid R; Fouladi DF; Golamian M; Hajalioghli P; Daghighi MH; Shahmorady Z; Niknejad MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140229. PubMed ID: 25426703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation.
    Reiner B; Siegel E; McLaurin T; Pomerantz S; Allman R; Hebel JR; Fritz S; Protopapas Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 8659358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging Foreign Bodies: Ingested, Aspirated, and Inserted.
    Tseng HJ; Hanna TN; Shuaib W; Aized M; Khosa F; Linnau KF
    Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 66(6):570-582.e5. PubMed ID: 26320521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic imaging of foreign bodies in the hand.
    Donaldson JS
    Hand Clin; 1991 Feb; 7(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 2037630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of foreign bodies in the hand.
    Russell RC; Williamson DA; Sullivan JW; Suchy H; Suliman O
    J Hand Surg Am; 1991 Jan; 16(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1995686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging of nonmetallic orbital foreign bodies.
    Wilson WB; Dreisbach JN; Lattin DE; Stears JC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1988 Jun; 105(6):612-7. PubMed ID: 3287937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro comparison of computed tomography, xeroradiography, and radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies.
    Kjhns LR; Borlaza GS; Seigel RS; Paramagul C; Berger PE
    Radiology; 1979 Jul; 132(1):218-9. PubMed ID: 451203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
    Javadrashid R; Golamian M; Shahrzad M; Hajalioghli P; Shahmorady Z; Fouladi DF; Sadrarhami S; Akhoundzadeh L
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 May; 68(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26899378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo detection and imaging of low-density foreign body with microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography.
    Nie L; Xing D; Yang S
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3429-37. PubMed ID: 19746776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing foreign bodies in the foot.
    Pattamapaspong N; Srisuwan T; Sivasomboon C; Nasuto M; Suwannahoy P; Settakorn J; Kraisarin J; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2013 Mar; 118(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 22744349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance.
    Peterson JJ; Bancroft LW; Kransdorf MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Mar; 178(3):557-62. PubMed ID: 11856673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomography of intraorbital foreign bodies.
    Lindahl S
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 2958028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ultrasonic identification of foreign bodies in superficial soft tissues].
    Cavallo A; Perini L; Natale F; Davi L; Annunziata N
    Radiol Med; 1990 Jun; 79(6):582-4. PubMed ID: 2200085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of ultrasonography in detection and localization of radiolucent foreign body in soft tissues of extremities.
    Shrestha D; Sharma UK; Mohammad R; Dhoju D
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2009; 48(173):5-9. PubMed ID: 19529050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies.
    Lari SS; Shokri A; Hosseinipanah SM; Rostami S; Sabounchi SS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 27207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.