343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28407203)
1. On the multiple imputation variance estimator for control-based and delta-adjusted pattern mixture models.
Tang Y
Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 28407203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analytic method for the placebo-based pattern-mixture model.
Lu K
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1134-45. PubMed ID: 24122822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An efficient monotone data augmentation algorithm for multiple imputation in a class of pattern mixture models.
Tang Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(4):620-638. PubMed ID: 27010771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On inference of control-based imputation for analysis of repeated binary outcomes with missing data.
Gao F; Liu G; Zeng D; Diao G; Heyse JF; Ibrahim JG
J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(3):358-372. PubMed ID: 28287873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distributional imputation for the analysis of censored recurrent events.
Fairfax SR; Yang S
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2622-2640. PubMed ID: 38684331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of imputation variance estimators.
Hughes RA; Sterne J; Tilling K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2541-2557. PubMed ID: 24682265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short notes on maximum likelihood inference for control-based pattern-mixture models.
Tang Y
Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 26178475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity analyses in longitudinal clinical trials via distributional imputation.
Liu S; Yang S; Zhang Y; Liu GF
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Jan; 32(1):181-194. PubMed ID: 36341772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SMIM: A unified framework of survival sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation and martingale.
Yang S; Zhang Y; Liu GF; Guan Q
Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):230-240. PubMed ID: 34453313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple imputation by predictive mean matching in cluster-randomized trials.
Bailey BE; Andridge R; Shoben AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 32228491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bootstrap inference for multiple imputation under uncongeniality and misspecification.
Bartlett JW; Hughes RA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3533-3546. PubMed ID: 32605503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple-Imputation Variance Estimation in Studies With Missing or Misclassified Inclusion Criteria.
Giganti MJ; Shepherd BE
Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Dec; 189(12):1628-1632. PubMed ID: 32685964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
Gosho M; Maruo K
Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closed-form REML estimators and sample size determination for mixed effects models for repeated measures under monotone missingness.
Tang Y
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(13):2135-2147. PubMed ID: 28226391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reference-based pattern-mixture models for analysis of longitudinal binary data.
Lu K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3770-3782. PubMed ID: 32698670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with missing continuous outcome data using controlled multiple imputation: A practical guide.
Cro S; Morris TP; Kenward MG; Carpenter JR
Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2815-2842. PubMed ID: 32419182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Number of imputations needed to stabilize estimated treatment difference in longitudinal data analysis.
Lu K
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):674-690. PubMed ID: 25305196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
