593 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28407297)
1. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset.
Caveney M; Haddad D; Matthews C; Badlani G; Mirzazadeh M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048. PubMed ID: 28407297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study.
Morling JR; McAllister DA; Agur W; Fischbacher CM; Glazener CM; Guerrero K; Hopkins L; Wood R
Lancet; 2017 Feb; 389(10069):629-640. PubMed ID: 28010993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term treatment outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery versus anterior-posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Cao Q; Chen YS; Ding JX; Hu CD; Feng WW; Hu WG; Hua KQ
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Feb; 53(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 23405998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.
Altman D; Väyrynen T; Engh ME; Axelsen S; Falconer C;
N Engl J Med; 2011 May; 364(19):1826-36. PubMed ID: 21561348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial.
Reid FM; Elders A; Breeman S; Freeman RM;
BJOG; 2021 Dec; 128(13):2180-2189. PubMed ID: 34473896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse.
Mowat A; Maher D; Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Haya N; Maher C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 3(3):CD012975. PubMed ID: 29502352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety of Mesh for Vaginal Cystocele Repair: Analysis of National Patient Characteristics and Complications.
Theofanides MC; Onyeji I; Matulay J; Sui W; James M; Chung DE
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):632-637. PubMed ID: 28396182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
Hanes CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Glazener CM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 20393938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes?
Ow LL; Lim YN; Dwyer PL; Karmakar D; Murray C; Thomas E; Rosamilia A
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1313-20. PubMed ID: 27324758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short term complications in mesh augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse are not higher when compared with native tissue repair.
Kanji S; Pascali D; Clancy AA
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1941-1947. PubMed ID: 34331076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Re-treatments of recurrence after pelvic floor repair surgery].
Fan SX; Wang FM; Lin LS; Song YF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):374-378. PubMed ID: 28647959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the 2015 Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey Study.
Wihersaari O; Karjalainen P; Tolppanen AM; Mattsson N; Jalkanen J; Nieminen K
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 33156186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.
Antosh DD; Dieter AA; Balk EM; Kanter G; Kim-Fine S; Meriwether KV; Mamik MM; Good MM; Singh R; Alas A; Foda MA; Rahn DD; Rogers RG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):475.e1-475.e19. PubMed ID: 34087227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
