43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2840746)
1. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlative imaging reveals physiochemical heterogeneity of microcalcifications in human breast carcinomas.
Kunitake JAMR; Choi S; Nguyen KX; Lee MM; He F; Sudilovsky D; Morris PG; Jochelson MS; Hudis CA; Muller DA; Fratzl P; Fischbach C; Masic A; Estroff LA
J Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 202(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 29221896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast screening saves lives: now is the time to address overtreatment.
Rea D; Francis A
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Mar; 3(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 24645681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic artifact leading to false-positive result.
Avelar MS; Almeida O; Alvares BR
Radiol Bras; 2015; 48(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 26185350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed using an ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: can underestimation be predicted preoperatively?
Park SH; Kim MJ; Kim SJ; Kim EK
Ultrasonography; 2014 Apr; 33(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 24936506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Altered coagulability: an aid to selective breast biopsy.
Spillert CR; Passannante MR; Salzer-Pagan JE; Lazaro EJ
J Natl Med Assoc; 1993 Apr; 85(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 8478968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of in situ and minimally invasive breast carcinoma.
Frykberg ER; Bland KI
World J Surg; 1994; 18(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 8197776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnosis and treatment of non-palpable breast lesions: from the biopsy to the microhistology results. Our experience].
de Rubeis GP; Bafile A; Mattucci S; Resta V; Vicentini R; Amicarelli I; Avitabile A; Ciccozzi A
Tumori; 2003; 89(4 Suppl):185-8. PubMed ID: 12903588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radio-pathological correlation of occult tumor of the breast.
Janus CL; Hermann G
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1984; 23(1):41-73. PubMed ID: 6100176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Limitations of mammography in the identification of noninfiltrating carcinoma of the breast.
Sener SF; Candela FC; Paige ML; Bernstein JR; Winchester DP
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 2840746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features.
Baker KS; Monsees BS; Diaz NM; Destouet JM; McDivitt RW
Radiology; 1990 Aug; 176(2):371-4. PubMed ID: 2164233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Holland R; Hendriks JH; van der Sluis RF; Lubbers EJ; de Boer HH
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 2825366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications.
Hermann G; Janus C; Schwartz IS; Papatestas A; Hermann DG; Rabinowitz JG
Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 2845470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance and staging of nonpalpable carcinomas of the breast.
Schwartz GF; Feig SA; Patchefsky AS
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jan; 166(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 2827328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
