These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28407702)

  • 21. Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences.
    Fujimori T; Miwa T; Oda T
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 29792993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of early and late surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation: is earlier better?
    Akagi R; Aoki Y; Ikeda Y; Nakajima F; Ohtori S; Takahashi K; Yamagata M
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 May; 15(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 20559795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
    Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Associations between sarcopenia and degenerative lumbar scoliosis in older women.
    Eguchi Y; Suzuki M; Yamanaka H; Tamai H; Kobayashi T; Orita S; Yamauchi K; Suzuki M; Inage K; Fujimoto K; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Aoki Y; Toyone T; Ozawa T; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
    Scoliosis Spinal Disord; 2017; 12():9. PubMed ID: 28331906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale : Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan.
    Fukui M; Chiba K; Kawakami M; Kikuchi S; Konno S; Miyamoto M; Seichi A; Shimamura T; Shirado O; Taguchi T; Takahashi K; Takeshita K; Tani T; Toyama Y; Wada E; Yonenobu K; Tanaka T; Hirota Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2008 May; 13(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 18528648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.
    Poosiripinyo T; Paholpak P; Jirarattanaphochai K; Kosuwon W; Sirichativapee W; Wisanuyotin T; Laupattarakasem P; Sukhonthamarn K; Jeeravipoolvarn P; Sakakibara T; Kasai Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):34-37. PubMed ID: 27793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Verification of the sensitivity of functional scores for treatment results - Substantial clinical benefit thresholds for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).
    Kasai Y; Fukui M; Takahashi K; Ohtori S; Takeuchi D; Hashizume H; Kanamori M; Hosono N; Kanchiku T; Wada E; Sekiguchi M; Konno S; Kawakami M
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jul; 22(4):665-669. PubMed ID: 28365168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression & foraminoplasty: a 10 year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery.
    Knight MT; Jago I; Norris C; Midwinter L; Boynes C
    Int J Spine Surg; 2014; 8():. PubMed ID: 25694924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.
    Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y; Wang L; Gong L; Zheng Y; Li J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 29303471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preliminary Results of Relationship between Preoperative Walking Ability and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphology in Patients with Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Comparison between Trefoil and Triangle Types of Spinal Stenosis.
    Azimi P; Yazdanian T; Benzel EC
    Asian Spine J; 2017 Aug; 11(4):580-585. PubMed ID: 28874976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Similar outcome despite slight clinical differences between lumbar radiculopathy induced by lateral versus medial disc herniations in patients without previous foraminal stenosis: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up.
    Mérot OA; Maugars YM; Berthelot JM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1526-31. PubMed ID: 24291407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Psychological Distress Associated with Patient-Reported Outcomes in Preoperative Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kitano T; Kawakami M; Ishimoto Y; Teraguchi M; Fukui D; Matsuoka T; Nakagawa Y
    Asian Spine J; 2021 Aug; 15(4):533-538. PubMed ID: 32872753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bowel/bladder dysfunction and numbness in the sole of the both feet in lumbar spinal stenosis - A multicenter cross-sectional study.
    Watanabe K; Sekiguchi M; Yonemoto K; Nikaido T; Kato K; Otani K; Yabuki S; Kakuma T; Kikuchi SI; Konno SI;
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jul; 22(4):647-651. PubMed ID: 28551282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of chronic low back pain with magnetic resonance imaging T2 mapping of lumbar intervertebral disc.
    Ogon I; Takebayashi T; Takashima H; Tanimoto K; Ida K; Yoshimoto M; Fujiwara H; Kubo T; Yamashita T
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 25649736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Classifying patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using painDETECT: a cross-sectional study.
    Takahashi N; Shirado O; Kobayashi K; Mashiko R; Konno S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():90. PubMed ID: 27443164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Paraspinal-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Takemoto M; Ota M; Nakamura T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 20887148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.