BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28407798)

  • 1. Utilization of defined microbial communities enables effective evaluation of meta-genomic assemblies.
    Greenwald WW; Klitgord N; Seguritan V; Yooseph S; Venter JC; Garner C; Nelson KE; Li W
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):296. PubMed ID: 28407798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences.
    Wang Z; Wang Y; Fuhrman JA; Sun F; Zhu S
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):777-790. PubMed ID: 30860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MetaVelvet-SL: an extension of the Velvet assembler to a de novo metagenomic assembler utilizing supervised learning.
    Afiahayati ; Sato K; Sakakibara Y
    DNA Res; 2015 Feb; 22(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25431440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Omega: an overlap-graph de novo assembler for metagenomics.
    Haider B; Ahn TH; Bushnell B; Chai J; Copeland A; Pan C
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(19):2717-22. PubMed ID: 24947750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-IDBA: a de Novo assembler for metagenomic data.
    Peng Y; Leung HC; Yiu SM; Chin FY
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(13):i94-101. PubMed ID: 21685107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical evaluation of 11 de novo assemblers in metagenome assembly.
    Forouzan E; Shariati P; Mousavi Maleki MS; Karkhane AA; Yakhchali B
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Aug; 151():99-105. PubMed ID: 29953874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.
    Fritz A; Hofmann P; Majda S; Dahms E; Dröge J; Fiedler J; Lesker TR; Belmann P; DeMaere MZ; Darling AE; Sczyrba A; Bremges A; McHardy AC
    Microbiome; 2019 Feb; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30736849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of de-novo assembly tools for plasmid metagenome analysis.
    Gupta SK; Raza S; Unno T
    Genes Genomics; 2019 Sep; 41(9):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 31187446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LMAS: evaluating metagenomic short de novo assembly methods through defined communities.
    Mendes CI; Vila-Cerqueira P; Motro Y; Moran-Gilad J; Carriço JA; Ramirez M
    Gigascience; 2022 Dec; 12():. PubMed ID: 36576131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes.
    Bertrand D; Shaw J; Kalathiyappan M; Ng AHQ; Kumar MS; Li C; Dvornicic M; Soldo JP; Koh JY; Tong C; Ng OT; Barkham T; Young B; Marimuthu K; Chng KR; Sikic M; Nagarajan N
    Nat Biotechnol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):937-944. PubMed ID: 31359005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth.
    Peng Y; Leung HC; Yiu SM; Chin FY
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 28(11):1420-8. PubMed ID: 22495754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
    Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating
    Vosloo S; Huo L; Anderson CL; Dai Z; Sevillano M; Pinto A
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0143421. PubMed ID: 34730411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical Assessment of Short-Read Assemblers for the Metagenomic Identification of Foodborne and Waterborne Pathogens Using Simulated Bacterial Communities.
    Chen Z; Meng J
    Microorganisms; 2022 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36557669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler.
    Nurk S; Meleshko D; Korobeynikov A; Pevzner PA
    Genome Res; 2017 May; 27(5):824-834. PubMed ID: 28298430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MetaVelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads.
    Namiki T; Hachiya T; Tanaka H; Sakakibara Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Nov; 40(20):e155. PubMed ID: 22821567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MG-RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function.
    Keegan KP; Glass EM; Meyer F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():207-33. PubMed ID: 26791506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes.
    Papudeshi B; Haggerty JM; Doane M; Morris MM; Walsh K; Beattie DT; Pande D; Zaeri P; Silva GGZ; Thompson F; Edwards RA; Dinsdale EA
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):915. PubMed ID: 29183281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of viral genome assembly and diversity estimation in deep metagenomes.
    Aguirre de Cárcer D; Angly FE; Alcamí A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):989. PubMed ID: 25407630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.