These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28407872)

  • 1. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stroop interference is a composite phenomenon: Evidence from distinct developmental trajectories of its components.
    Ferrand L; Ducrot S; Chausse P; Maïonchi-Pino N; O'Connor RJ; Parris BA; Perret P; Riggs KJ; Augustinova M
    Dev Sci; 2020 Mar; 23(2):e12899. PubMed ID: 31483912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task.
    Chen Z; Lei X; Ding C; Li H; Chen A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():577-84. PubMed ID: 23103691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses.
    Augustinova M; Parris BA; Ferrand L
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1786. PubMed ID: 31481908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
    Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is There Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task?
    Burca M; Beaucousin V; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 68(5):274-283. PubMed ID: 34911356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in the Stroop task: New evidence from the two-to-one Stroop paradigm.
    Burca M; Chausse P; Ferrand L; Parris BA; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 34595729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop interference effect: It's about (response) time.
    Martinon LM; Ferrand L; Burca M; Hasshim N; Lakhzoum D; Parris BA; Silvert L; Augustinova M
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Aug; 52(6):1229-1245. PubMed ID: 38467923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.
    Hasshim N; Downes M; Bate S; Parris BA
    Exp Psychol; 2019 May; 66(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 31266430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Ferrand L; Llorca PM; Flaudias V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 25092389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two distinct patterns of interference in between-attribute Stroop matching tasks.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):563-581. PubMed ID: 27981523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.
    Augustinova M; Flaudias V; Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 21169576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study.
    van Veen V; Carter CS
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):497-504. PubMed ID: 15964208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.
    Ferrand L; Augustinova M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):425-31. PubMed ID: 24002970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.