817 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28408009)
1. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China.
Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Less Is More: Cross-Validation Testing of Simplified Nonlinear Regression Model Specifications for EQ-5D-5L Health State Values.
Rand-Hendriksen K; Ramos-Goñi JM; Augestad LA; Luo N
Value Health; 2017; 20(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 28712624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores.
McClure NS; Sayah FA; Xie F; Luo N; Johnson JA
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28408007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?
Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states.
Liu GG; Wu H; Li M; Gao C; Luo N
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25128053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K
Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Introduction of the Ranking Task in Valuation Studies Improve Data Quality and Reduce Inconsistencies? The Case of the EQ-5D-5L.
Ramos-Goñi JM; Rand-Hendriksen K; Pinto-Prades JL
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 27325340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Wong CKH; Cheung PWH; Samartzis D; Luk KD; Cheung KMC; Lam CLK; Cheung JPY
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175847. PubMed ID: 28414745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
Hobbins A; Barry L; Kelleher D; Shah K; Devlin N; Goni JMR; O'Neill C
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1345-1353. PubMed ID: 30051267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Valuation of Health States Considered to Be Worse Than Death-An Analysis of Composite Time Trade-Off Data From 5 EQ-5D-5L Valuation Studies.
Gandhi M; Rand K; Luo N
Value Health; 2019 Mar; 22(3):370-376. PubMed ID: 30832976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.
M Versteegh M; M Vermeulen K; M A A Evers S; de Wit GA; Prenger R; A Stolk E
Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 27325326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Chinese have similar health-state preferences? A comparison of mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese.
Wang P; Li MH; Liu GG; Thumboo J; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Nov; 16(8):857-63. PubMed ID: 25260384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Health State Sampling Methods on Model Predictions of EQ-5D-5L Values: Small Designs Can Suffice.
Yang Z; Luo N; Bonsel G; Busschbach J; Stolk E
Value Health; 2019 Jan; 22(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 30661632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
Sayah FA; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Pullenayegum E; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 26659899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.
Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians.
Welie AG; Gebretekle GB; Stolk E; Mukuria C; Krahn MD; Enquoselassie F; Fenta TG
Value Health Reg Issues; 2020 Sep; 22():7-14. PubMed ID: 31683254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments.
Purba FD; Hunfeld JAM; Timman R; Iskandarsyah A; Fitriana TS; Sadarjoen SS; Passchier J; Busschbach JJV
Value Health; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1243-1249. PubMed ID: 30314626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which approach is better in eliciting health state utilities from breast cancer patients? Evidence from mainland China.
Li S; Wang M; Liu L; Chen G
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Mar; 28(2):e12965. PubMed ID: 30499193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
