These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28408147)
1. An anatomical subunit-based outcome assessment scale for bilateral cleft lip and palate. Bonanthaya K; Shetty PN; Fudalej PS; Rao DD; Bitra S; Pabari M; Rachwalski M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 46(8):988-992. PubMed ID: 28408147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment. Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; de Vet HCW; Mouës CM; Breugem CC; van der Molen ABM; Don Griot JPW Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):1006-1012. PubMed ID: 27996297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two scoring systems in the assessment of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients. Mosmuller DG; Bijnen CL; Don Griot JP; Kramer GJ; Disse MA; Prahl C; Kuik DJ; Niessen FB J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1222-5. PubMed ID: 24978682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Mosmuller DGM; Mennes LM; Prahl C; Kramer GJC; Disse MA; van Couwelaar GM; Niessen FB; Griot JPWD Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Sep; 54(5):555-561. PubMed ID: 27537493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional assessment methods of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients: Do the assessment methods measure the same outcome? Mosmuller DGM; Maal TJ; Prahl C; Tan RA; Mulder FJ; Schwirtz RMF; de Vet HCW; Bergé SJ; Don Griot JPW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 28552202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Al-Omari I; Millett DT; Ayoub A; Bock M; Ray A; Dunaway D; Crampin L Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 12943433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lay People Esthetic Evaluation of Primary Surgical Repair on Three-Dimensional Images of Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Staderini E; De Luca M; Candida E; Rizzo MI; Rajabtork Zadeh O; Bucci D; Zama M; Lajolo C; Cordaro M; Gallenzi P Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Sep; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31500380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of bilateral cleft lip nose deformity: a comparison of results as judged by cleft surgeons and laypersons. Lo LJ; Wong FH; Mardini S; Chen YR; Noordhoff MS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 110(3):733-8; discussion 739-41. PubMed ID: 12172130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rating Nasolabial Aesthetics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Cropped Versus Full-Face Images. Schwirtz RMF; Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; Tan RA; Maal TJ; Prahl C; de Vet HCW; Don Griot JPW Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):747-752. PubMed ID: 29350971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial Aesthetic Outcomes of Cleft Surgery: Assessment of Discrete Lip and Nose Images Compared with Digital Symmetry Analysis. Deall CE; Kornmann NSS; Bella H; Wallis KL; Hardwicke JT; Su TL; Richard BM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):855-862. PubMed ID: 27307335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of 5-year-old children with complete cleft lip and palate: Multicenter study. Part 1: Lip and nose aesthetic results. Dissaux C; Bodin F; Grollemund B; Picard A; Vazquez MP; Morand B; James I; Kauffmann I; Bruant-Rodier C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2085-92. PubMed ID: 26515264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unilateral cleft nose deformities at adulthood. Assouline-Vitale SL; Ruffenach L; Bodin F; Zink S; Romary B; Bruant-Rodier C; Dissaux C Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2023 Apr; 68(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 35927106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use and reliability of SymNose for quantitative measurement of the nose and lip in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Mosmuller D; Tan R; Mulder F; Bachour Y; de Vet H; Don Griot P J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1515-1521. PubMed ID: 27562104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate. Fudalej SA; Desmedt D; Bronkhorst E; Fudalej PS Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):400-407. PubMed ID: 28140671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment. Ritter K; Trotman CA; Phillips C Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Nov; 39(6):587-96. PubMed ID: 12401105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Asher-McDade C; Roberts C; Shaw WC; Gallager C Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Oct; 28(4):385-90; discussion 390-1. PubMed ID: 1742308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Asher-McDade C; Brattström V; Dahl E; McWilliam J; Mølsted K; Plint DA; Prahl-Andersen B; Semb G; Shaw WC; The RP Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Sep; 29(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 1472518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional assessment of facial appearance following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Bell A; Lo TW; Brown D; Bowman AW; Siebert JP; Simmons DR; Millett DT; Ayoub AF Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2014 Jul; 51(4):462-71. PubMed ID: 23369016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 2: Comparative anthropometric analysis of patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and healthy individuals. Pietruski P; Majak M; Pawlowska E; Skiba A; Antoszewski B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):505-514. PubMed ID: 28258919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]