These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Scheetz MD Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Case study: research subject says institutional review board (IRB) was no help. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2006 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 16789306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Role of research institutions in management of scientific fraud: The example of Inserm Scientific Integrity delegation]. Bungener M; Hadchouel M Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):841-6. PubMed ID: 22727982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime? Redman BK; Merz JF Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Fostering integrity in scientific research and publishing. Burton GA; Wenning RJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):560-561. PubMed ID: 28613026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientific misconduct. Back to the drawing board. Anderson C Nature; 1991 Mar; 350(6314):100. PubMed ID: 1848681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Popovic says OSI is wrong. Popovic M Nature; 1992 Aug; 358(6387):533. PubMed ID: 1501706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. How Chinese scientific societies should promote the construction of research integrity. Wang F; Li Y Account Res; 2020 Jul; 27(5):271-283. PubMed ID: 32293199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity reviews papers, holds second meeting. Fox J Biosecur Bioterror; 2006; 4(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 16602142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]