153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28408724)
1. From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies.
Jecker NS; Wightman AG; Rosenberg AR; Diekema DS
J Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 43(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 28408724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The history and moral foundations of human-subject research.
Blustein J
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 86(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 17251690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research versus innovation: real differences.
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A quartet of criticisms.
Vanderpool HY
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16179299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Undue inducement: the only objection to payment?
VanderWalde A
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):25-7. PubMed ID: 16179303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Free-riding and research ethics.
Allhoff F
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):50-1; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The fair transaction model of informed consent: an alternative to autonomous authorization.
Miller FG; Wertheimer A
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2011 Sep; 21(3):201-18. PubMed ID: 22073815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ethical neuroscientist.
Nat Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 11(3):239. PubMed ID: 18301426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.
;
J Am Coll Dent; 2014; 81(3):4-13. PubMed ID: 25951677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Research exceptionalism.
Wilson J; Hunter D
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):45-54. PubMed ID: 20694909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity.
MacKay D
J Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 42(10):672-7. PubMed ID: 27432910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does uncle Sam really want you? A response to "Rethinking research Ethics" by Rosamond Rhodes (AJOB 5:1).
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):W22-3. PubMed ID: 16036645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.
Levine C; Faden R; Grady C; Hammerschmidt D; Eckenwiler L; Sugarman J;
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16192138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "You may have already won..": an examination of the use of lottery payments in research.
Brown JS; Schonfeld TL; Gordon BG
IRB; 2006; 28(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16680874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: a family resemblance analysis.
Goldberg DS
J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):296-320. PubMed ID: 21606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
