250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28408746)
1. Novel metrics to measure coverage in whole exome sequencing datasets reveal local and global non-uniformity.
Wang Q; Shashikant CS; Jensen M; Altman NS; Girirajan S
Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7(1):885. PubMed ID: 28408746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic dissection of biases in whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing reveals major determinants of coding sequence coverage.
Barbitoff YA; Polev DE; Glotov AS; Serebryakova EA; Shcherbakova IV; Kiselev AM; Kostareva AA; Glotov OS; Predeus AV
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2057. PubMed ID: 32029882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced whole exome sequencing by higher DNA insert lengths.
Pommerenke C; Geffers R; Bunk B; Bhuju S; Eberth S; Drexler HG; Quentmeier H
BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27225215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Exome and Genome Sequencing Technologies for the Complete Capture of Protein-Coding Regions.
Lelieveld SH; Spielmann M; Mundlos S; Veltman JA; Gilissen C
Hum Mutat; 2015 Aug; 36(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 25973577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Saliva as a comparable-quality source of DNA for Whole Exome Sequencing on Ion platforms.
Ibrahim O; Sutherland HG; Haupt LM; Griffiths LR
Genomics; 2020 Mar; 112(2):1437-1443. PubMed ID: 31445087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) for Illumina Short Read Sequencers Using Solution-Based Capture.
Mahajan MC; McLellan AS
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2076():85-108. PubMed ID: 31586323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High throughput exome coverage of clinically relevant cardiac genes.
Manase D; D'Alessandro LC; Manickaraj AK; Al Turki S; Hurles ME; Mital S
BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Dec; 7():67. PubMed ID: 25496018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
Trudsø LC; Andersen JD; Jacobsen SB; Christiansen SL; Congost-Teixidor C; Kampmann ML; Morling N
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239850. PubMed ID: 32986766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and economics of targeted panel versus whole-exome sequencing in 878 patients with suspected primary immunodeficiency.
Platt CD; Zaman F; Bainter W; Stafstrom K; Almutairi A; Reigle M; Weeks S; Geha RS; Chou J;
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2021 Feb; 147(2):723-726. PubMed ID: 32888943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. WEScover: selection between clinical whole exome sequencing and gene panel testing.
Lee IH; Lin Y; Alvarez WJ; Hernandez-Ferrer C; Mandl KD; Kong SW
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 22(1):259. PubMed ID: 34016036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole exome sequencing in the rat.
Foley JF; Phadke DP; Hardy O; Hardy S; Miller V; Madan A; Howard K; Kruse K; Lord C; Ramaiahgari S; Solomon GG; Shah RR; Pandiri AR; Herbert RA; Sills RC; Merrick BA
BMC Genomics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):487. PubMed ID: 29925311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance comparison of four types of target enrichment baits for exome DNA sequencing.
Zhou J; Zhang M; Li X; Wang Z; Pan D; Shi Y
Hereditas; 2021 Feb; 158(1):10. PubMed ID: 33597004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New insights into the performance of human whole-exome capture platforms.
Meienberg J; Zerjavic K; Keller I; Okoniewski M; Patrignani A; Ludin K; Xu Z; Steinmann B; Carrel T; Röthlisberger B; Schlapbach R; Bruggmann R; Matyas G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jun; 43(11):e76. PubMed ID: 25820422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DeNovoCNN: a deep learning approach to de novo variant calling in next generation sequencing data.
Khazeeva G; Sablauskas K; van der Sanden B; Steyaert W; Kwint M; Rots D; Hinne M; van Gerven M; Yntema H; Vissers L; Gilissen C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Sep; 50(17):e97. PubMed ID: 35713566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replicate exome-sequencing in a multiple-generation family: improved interpretation of next-generation sequencing data.
Cherukuri PF; Maduro V; Fuentes-Fajardo KV; Lam K; ; Adams DR; Tifft CJ; Mullikin JC; Gahl WA; Boerkoel CF
BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():998. PubMed ID: 26602380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An efficient and tunable parameter to improve variant calling for whole genome and exome sequencing data.
Ahn YJ; Markkandan K; Baek IP; Mun S; Lee W; Kim HS; Han K
Genes Genomics; 2018 Jan; 40(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 29892897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterizing reduced coverage regions through comparison of exome and genome sequencing data across 10 centers.
Sanghvi RV; Buhay CJ; Powell BC; Tsai EA; Dorschner MO; Hong CS; Lebo MS; Sasson A; Hanna DS; McGee S; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Gray DE; Lonigro RJ; Dunford A; Brennan CA; Cibulskis C; Walker K; Carneiro MO; Sailsbery J; Hindorff LA; Robinson DR; Santani A; Sarmady M; Rehm HL; Biesecker LG; Nickerson DA; Hutter CM; Garraway L; Muzny DM; Wagle N;
Genet Med; 2018 Aug; 20(8):855-866. PubMed ID: 29144510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Twist exome capture allows for lower average sequence coverage in clinical exome sequencing.
Yaldiz B; Kucuk E; Hampstead J; Hofste T; Pfundt R; Corominas Galbany J; Rinne T; Yntema HG; Hoischen A; Nelen M; Gilissen C;
Hum Genomics; 2023 May; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 37138343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interplay between probe design and test performance: overlap between genomic regions of interest, capture regions and high quality reference calls influence performance of WES-based assays.
Pranckeviciene E; Racacho L; Ghani M; Nfonsam L; Potter R; Sinclair-Bourque E; Mettler G; Smith A; Bronicki L; Huang L; Jarinova O
Hum Genet; 2021 Feb; 140(2):289-297. PubMed ID: 32627054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
