These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28409202)

  • 1. Imaging evaluation of ablative margin and index tumor immediately after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between multidetector-row CT and MR imaging.
    Kim SM; Shin SS; Lee BC; Kim JW; Heo SH; Lim HS; Jeong YY
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Oct; 42(10):2527-2537. PubMed ID: 28409202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of Nonrigid Registration of Pre-Procedure MR with Post-Procedure CT After Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park J; Lee JM; Lee DH; Joo I; Yoon JH; Park JY; Klotz E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2017 Jun; 40(6):873-883. PubMed ID: 28091728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical usefulness of the ablative margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Okamoto T; Hodozuka M; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Oyama K; Hosho K; Okano J; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Hepatol; 2015 Dec; 63(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 26232269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging with superparamagnetic iron oxide.
    Fukuda K; Mori K; Hasegawa N; Nasu K; Ishige K; Okamoto Y; Shiigai M; Abei M; Minami M; Hyodo I
    Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):555-563. PubMed ID: 31102138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion.
    Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ablative margin states by magnetic resonance imaging with ferucarbotran in radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma can predict local tumor progression.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):1283-92. PubMed ID: 23338488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does hepatobiliary phase sequence qualitatively outperform unenhanced T1-weighted imaging in assessment of the ablation margin 24 hours after thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas?
    Takeyama N; Vidhyarkorn S; Chung DJ; Siripongsakun S; Kim HJ; Lu DS; Raman SS
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Oct; 41(10):1942-55. PubMed ID: 27271219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma ablative margins using fused pre- and post-ablation hepatobiliary phase images.
    Takeyama N; Mizobuchi N; Sakaki M; Shimozuma Y; Munechika J; Kajiwara A; Uchikoshi M; Uozumi S; Ohgiya Y; Gokan T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):923-935. PubMed ID: 30327828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Assessment of Ablative Margin Using Pre-RFA MRI and Post-RFA CT Registration.
    Yoon JH; Lee JM; Klotz E; Woo H; Yu MH; Joo I; Lee ES; Han JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1053-1065. PubMed ID: 30386137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of ablative margin after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma; comparison between magnetic resonance imaging with ferucarbotran and enhanced CT with iodized oil deposition.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Sugihara T; Nagahara T; Ueki M; Murawaki Y; Kakite S; Yamashita E
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1400-4. PubMed ID: 21440397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the ablation margin of hepatocellular carcinoma using CEUS-CT/MR image fusion in a phantom model and in patients.
    Li K; Su Z; Xu E; Huang Q; Zeng Q; Zheng R
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Jan; 17(1):61. PubMed ID: 28103837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of ablative margin by unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Koda M; Tokunaga S; Miyoshi K; Kishina M; Fujise Y; Kato J; Matono T; Okamoto K; Murawaki Y; Kakite S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2730-6. PubMed ID: 22137612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of three-dimensional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR fusion imaging with CT fusion imaging in the assessment of treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Makino Y; Imai Y; Igura T; Hori M; Fukuda K; Sawai Y; Kogita S; Fujita N; Takehara T; Murakami T
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jan; 40(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25052767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ablation Zones and Margins for Predicting Local Tumor Progression.
    Hocquelet A; Trillaud H; Frulio N; Papadopoulos P; Balageas P; Salut C; Meyer M; Blanc JF; Montaudon M; Denis de Senneville B
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):1038-1045.e2. PubMed ID: 27156743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging versus four-phase multi-detector row computed tomography in assessing tumor regression after radiofrequency ablation in subjects with hepatocellular carcinomas.
    Yoon JH; Lee EJ; Cha SS; Han SS; Choi SJ; Juhn JR; Kim MH; Lee YJ; Park SJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 20116285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced US-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Rajesh S; Mukund A; Arora A; Jain D; Sarin SK
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Aug; 24(8):1235-40. PubMed ID: 23796857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronal reformatted CT images contribute to the precise evaluation of the radiofrequency ablative margin for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Motoyama T; Ogasawara S; Chiba T; Higashide T; Yokota H; Kanogawa N; Suzuki E; Ooka Y; Tawada A; Irie R; Ochi S; Masuda Y; Uno T; Yokosuka O
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Apr; 39(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 24346490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D fusion is superior to 2D point-to-point contrast-enhanced US to evaluate the ablative margin after RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Long H; Zhou X; Zhang X; Ye J; Huang T; Cong L; Xie X; Huang G
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 37572191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The tumor ghost on MRI after microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A new modality to assess the ablative margin.
    Liu S; Wu J; Ding W; Zhang C; Luo Y; Bai X; Wen K; Han Z; Yu J; Liang P
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110617. PubMed ID: 36463706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postablation assessment using follow-up registration of CT images before and after radiofrequency ablation (RFA): prospective evaluation of midterm therapeutic results of RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Shin S; Lee JM; Kim KW; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI; Klotz E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 24951197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.