264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28410566)
1. Biomechanical effect of interspinous process distraction height after lumbar fixation surgery: An in vitro model.
Fu L; Ma J; Lu B; Jia H; Zhao J; Kuang M; Feng R; Xu L; Bai H; Sun L; Wang Y; Ma X
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Jul; 231(7):663-672. PubMed ID: 28410566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical cadaveric study of a modified U-shaped interspinous distraction device.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangpornprasert P; Wangroongsub Y; Itiravivong P; Limpaphayom N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 24979230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation and interspinous fixation on the stiffness of adjacent segments.
Li CD; Sun HL; Lu HZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(9):1732-7. PubMed ID: 23652059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment.
Kong C; Lu S; Hai Y; Zang L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 May; 30(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 25779689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel pedicle screw and plate system provides superior stability in unilateral fixation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Li J; Xiao H; Zhu Q; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H; Huang Z; Shang J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0123134. PubMed ID: 25807513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis in a human cadaveric model of spinous process fixation with an interlaminar allograft spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis: Laboratory investigation.
Pradhan BB; Turner AW; Zatushevsky MA; Cornwall GB; Rajaee SS; Bae HW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):585-93. PubMed ID: 22519928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of a lumbar interspinous anchor with anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Karahalios DG; Kaibara T; Porter RW; Kakarla UK; Reyes PM; Baaj AA; Yaqoobi AS; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Apr; 12(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 20367372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
