125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28410616)
1. Breast masses in mammography classification with local contour features.
Li H; Meng X; Wang T; Tang Y; Yin Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 28410616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
Varela C; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractal analysis of contours of breast masses in mammograms.
Rangayyan RM; Nguyen TM
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17021926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Gurcan M
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2309-17. PubMed ID: 11764038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feature extraction from a signature based on the turning angle function for the classification of breast tumors.
Guliato D; de Carvalho JD; Rangayyan RM; Santiago SA
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 17972137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on multi-level fractal features extraction method of breast mass].
Ke L; Zhang X; Kang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 30(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23858747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Polygonal modeling of contours of breast tumors with the preservation of spicules.
Guliato D; Rangayyan RM; Carvalho JD; Santiago SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 18232342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors.
Rangayyan RM; El-Faramawy NM; Desautels JE; Alim OA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 9533580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An efficient fractal method for detection and diagnosis of breast masses in mammograms.
Beheshti SM; AhmadiNoubari H; Fatemizadeh E; Khalili M
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):661-9. PubMed ID: 24777687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
Rojas-DomÃnguez A; Nandi AK
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fissures segmentation using surface features: content-based retrieval for mammographic mass using ensemble classifier.
Liu H; Lan Y; Xu X; Song E; Hung CC
Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1475-84. PubMed ID: 22055794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-scale attention-based convolutional neural network for classification of breast masses in mammograms.
Niu J; Li H; Zhang C; Li D
Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 48(7):3878-3892. PubMed ID: 33982807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Metz CE
Phys Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 44(10):2579-95. PubMed ID: 10533930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses.
Rangayyan RM; Mudigonda NR; Desautels JE
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 11094803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Building an ensemble system for diagnosing masses in mammograms.
Zhang Y; Tomuro N; Furst J; Raicu DS
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 21671095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Region based stellate features combined with variable selection using AdaBoost learning in mammographic computer-aided detection.
Kim DH; Choi JY; Ro YM
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Aug; 63():238-50. PubMed ID: 25444461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
