128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28410686)
1. Relations between doses cumulated in bone marrow and dose delivery techniques during radiation therapy of cervical and endometrial cancer.
Jodda A; Urbański B; Piotrowski T; Malicki J
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():54-59. PubMed ID: 28410686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal dose limitation strategy for bone marrow sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Bao Z; Wang D; Chen S; Chen M; Jiang D; Yang C; Liu H; Dai J; Xie C
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):118. PubMed ID: 31378200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Analysis of VMAT and IMRT Techniques: Evaluation of Dose Constraints and Bone Marrow Sparing in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.
Thakur N; Kaur H; Kaur S; Lehal P; Sudan M; Jain N; Sharma R; Sharma A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Jan; 25(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 38285777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. NTCP modeling analysis of acute hematologic toxicity in whole pelvic radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies - A dosimetric comparison of IMRT and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT).
Yoshimura T; Kinoshita R; Onodera S; Toramatsu C; Suzuki R; Ito YM; Takao S; Matsuura T; Matsuzaki Y; Umegaki K; Shirato H; Shimizu S
Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1095-102. PubMed ID: 27567089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy prostate cancer plans accounting for cold spots.
Nguyen TTT; Arimura H; Asamura R; Hirose TA; Ohga S; Fukunaga JI
Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Jun; 12(2):137-148. PubMed ID: 30805779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the target dose fall-off in IMRT and VMAT planning techniques for cervical SBRT.
Brito Delgado A; Cohen D; Eng TY; Stanley DN; Shi Z; Charlton M; Gutiérrez AN
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29223302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relations between dose cumulated in organs at risk and treatment based on different image-guidance strategies of cervical cancer.
Jodda A; Piotrowski T; Urbański B; Malicki J
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():183-190. PubMed ID: 30738524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility study of volumetric modulated arc therapy with constant dose rate for endometrial cancer.
Yang R; Wang J; Xu F; Li H; Zhang X
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 23669454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Dosimetric Analysis of Modified Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Bone Marrow Sparing Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer-An alternative Approach to Conventional VMAT.
Palani D; Govindaraj K; Sampathrajan S; Karunagaran L; Ganesh KM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Dec; 23(12):4323-4332. PubMed ID: 36580016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. VMAT vs. 7-field-IMRT: assessing the dosimetric parameters of prostate cancer treatment with a 292-patient sample.
Kopp RW; Duff M; Catalfamo F; Shah D; Rajecki M; Ahmad K
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 21377863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated, conformal, and four-field pelvic radiotherapy boost plans for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective planning study.
Chan P; Yeo I; Perkins G; Fyles A; Milosevic M
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():13. PubMed ID: 16722546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does VMAT for treatment of NSCLC patients increase the risk of pneumonitis compared to IMRT ? - a planning study.
Bertelsen A; Hansen O; Brink C
Acta Oncol; 2012 Jul; 51(6):752-8. PubMed ID: 22248064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
Mell LK; Tiryaki H; Ahn KH; Mundt AJ; Roeske JC; Aydogan B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Aug; 71(5):1504-10. PubMed ID: 18640499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric and efficiency comparison of high-dose radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Lin CY; Huang WY; Jen YM; Chen CM; Su YF; Chao HL; Lin CS
Dis Esophagus; 2014 Aug; 27(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 24134466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chest wall desmoid tumours treated with definitive radiotherapy: a plan comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy.
Liu J; Ng D; Lee J; Stalley P; Hong A
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():34. PubMed ID: 26935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.
Sharfo AW; Breedveld S; Voet PW; Heijkoop ST; Mens JM; Hoogeman MS; Heijmen BJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0169202. PubMed ID: 28033342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy as a means of reducing dose to bone marrow in gynecologic patients receiving whole pelvic radiotherapy.
Lujan AE; Mundt AJ; Yamada SD; Rotmensch J; Roeske JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Oct; 57(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 12957265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
