BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28411671)

  • 1. Evidence to Support Screening Women in Their 40s.
    Ray KM; Price ER; Joe BN
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):429-439. PubMed ID: 28411671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence to Support Screening Women Annually.
    Eby PR
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):441-456. PubMed ID: 28411672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
    Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
    Pace LE; He Y; Keating NL
    Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(14):2518-23. PubMed ID: 23605683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. To screen or not to screen women in their 40s for breast cancer: is personalized risk-based screening the answer?
    Mandelblatt JS; Stout N; Trentham-Dietz A
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 21727294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective biennial mammographic screening in women aged 40-49.
    van Schoor G; Moss SM; Otten JD; Donders R; Paap E; den Heeten GJ; Holland R; Broeders MJ; Verbeek AL
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 46(18):3137-40. PubMed ID: 21036034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
    Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
    Pace LE; Keating NL
    JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening Mammography for Women in Their 40s: The Potential Impact of the American Cancer Society and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations.
    Pitman JA; McGinty GB; Soman RR; Drotman MB; Reichman MB; Arleo EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 28504572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Fu R; Cantor A; Pappas M; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 26756588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 22358016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing Theory-Based Messages to Encourage Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer to Consider Biennial Mammography Screening.
    Guan Y; Haardörfer R; McBride CM; Escoffery C; Lipscomb J
    Ann Behav Med; 2023 Aug; 57(9):696-707. PubMed ID: 37155576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Annual Screening Mammography Associated With Lower Stage Breast Cancer Compared With Biennial Screening.
    Moorman SEH; Pujara AC; Sakala MD; Neal CH; Maturen KE; Swartz L; Egloff H; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 33955776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nationwide cross-sectional adherence to mammography screening guidelines: national behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey results.
    Narayan A; Fischer A; Zhang Z; Woods R; Morris E; Harvey S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):719-725. PubMed ID: 28508184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Models and High-Risk Screening.
    Barke LD; Freivogel ME
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):457-474. PubMed ID: 28411673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.