These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28411672)

  • 1. Evidence to Support Screening Women Annually.
    Eby PR
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):441-456. PubMed ID: 28411672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence to Support Screening Women in Their 40s.
    Ray KM; Price ER; Joe BN
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):429-439. PubMed ID: 28411671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
    US Preventive Services Task Force
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Friedewald SM; Sickles EA; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 29045178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
    Pace LE; He Y; Keating NL
    Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(14):2518-23. PubMed ID: 23605683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insights Into Breast Cancer Screening: A Computer Simulation of Two Contemporary Screening Strategies.
    Carter KJ; Castro F; Morcos RN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):564-571. PubMed ID: 29323554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient, primary care provider, and stakeholder perspectives on mammography screening frequency: lessons learned from a qualitative study.
    Ro V; Jones T; Silverman T; McGuinness JE; Guzman A; Amenta J; Kukafka R; Crew KD
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Jul; 22(1):819. PubMed ID: 35897000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Annual vs Biennial Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy Among Concurrent Cohorts Within the Ontario Breast Screening Program.
    Chiarelli AM; Blackmore KM; Mirea L; Done SJ; Majpruz V; Weerasinghe A; Rabeneck L; Muradali D
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 Apr; 112(4):400-409. PubMed ID: 31233138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Annual Screening Mammography Associated With Lower Stage Breast Cancer Compared With Biennial Screening.
    Moorman SEH; Pujara AC; Sakala MD; Neal CH; Maturen KE; Swartz L; Egloff H; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 33955776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alignment of breast cancer screening guidelines, accountability metrics, and practice patterns.
    Onega T; Haas JS; Bitton A; Brackett C; Weiss J; Goodrich M; Harris K; Pyle S; Tosteson AN
    Am J Manag Care; 2017 Jan; 23(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28141929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 22358016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective biennial mammographic screening in women aged 40-49.
    van Schoor G; Moss SM; Otten JD; Donders R; Paap E; den Heeten GJ; Holland R; Broeders MJ; Verbeek AL
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 46(18):3137-40. PubMed ID: 21036034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward the breast screening balance sheet: cumulative risk of false positives for annual versus biennial mammograms commencing at age 40 or 50.
    Winch CJ; Sherman KA; Boyages J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jan; 149(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 25476499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary ACOG Practice Bulletin July 2017: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women.
    Mango V; Bryce Y; Morris EA; Gianotti E; Pinker K
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170907. PubMed ID: 29688040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome analysis for women undergoing annual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations.
    Hunt KA; Rosen EL; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 10430120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
    Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for Breast Cancer.
    Niell BL; Freer PE; Weinfurtner RJ; Arleo EK; Drukteinis JS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 Nov; 55(6):1145-1162. PubMed ID: 28991557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.