179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28411964)
1. Understanding what matters: An exploratory study to investigate the views of the general public for priority setting criteria in health care.
Ratcliffe J; Lancsar E; Walker R; Gu Y
Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):653-662. PubMed ID: 28411964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public views on principles for health care priority setting: findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology.
van Exel J; Baker R; Mason H; Donaldson C; Brouwer W;
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Feb; 126():128-37. PubMed ID: 25550076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public perspectives on disinvestments in drug funding: results from a Canadian deliberative public engagement event on cancer drugs.
Costa S; Bentley C; Regier DA; McTaggart-Cowan H; Mitton C; Burgess MM; Peacock SJ
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):977. PubMed ID: 31331312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Priority to End of Life Treatments? Views of the Public in the Netherlands.
Wouters S; van Exel J; Baker R; B F Brouwer W
Value Health; 2017 Jan; 20(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 28212951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From representing views to representativeness of views: Illustrating a new (Q2S) approach in the context of health care priority setting in nine European countries.
Mason H; van Exel J; Baker R; Brouwer W; Donaldson C;
Soc Sci Med; 2016 Oct; 166():205-213. PubMed ID: 27575932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent.
Gu Y; Lancsar E; Ghijben P; Butler JR; Donaldson C
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 146():41-52. PubMed ID: 26498059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature.
Cromwell I; Peacock SJ; Mitton C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Apr; 15():164. PubMed ID: 25927636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Priority-setting in public health research funding organisations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders.
Cartier Y; Creatore MI; Hoffman SJ; Potvin L
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jun; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 29933748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden.
Eckard N; Janzon M; Levin LÅ
Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Nov; 3(6):323-32. PubMed ID: 25396208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
Aidem JM
Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IMPORTANCE OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA FOR PRIORITY SETTING OF HIV/AIDS INTERVENTIONS.
Tromp N; Prawiranegara R; Siregar A; Sunjaya D; Baltussen R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015; 31(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 26961721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disease control priorities for neglected tropical diseases: lessons from priority ranking based on the quality of evidence, cost effectiveness, severity of disease, catastrophic health expenditures, and loss of productivity.
Strømme EM; Baerøe K; Norheim OF
Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):132-41. PubMed ID: 23724925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
Shaller D
Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
