BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28411964)

  • 21. Preferences for the normative basis of health care priority setting: some evidence from two countries.
    Olsen JA; Richardson J
    Health Econ; 2013 Apr; 22(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 22359416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.
    Gallego G; Taylor SJ; McNeill P; Brien JA
    Health Expect; 2007 Sep; 10(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 17678511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Priority setting and rationing of pharmaceuticals - an experimental analysis of discussion processes].
    Aumann I; Litzkendorf S; Damm K; von der Schulenburg JMG
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2017 Aug; 125():3-13. PubMed ID: 28694036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. International validation of quality indicators for evaluating priority setting in low income countries: process and key lessons.
    Kapiriri L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 17(1):418. PubMed ID: 28629347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Priority setting and resource allocation in the US health system: is there a place for hard caps?
    Mitton C; Dionne F
    J Health Organ Manag; 2020 Feb; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):. PubMed ID: 32096928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Priority dilemmas in psoriasis care and visions of a future care in a group of administrators, politicians and professionals in northern Sweden.
    Uttjek M; DufÄker M; Stenberg B; Nygren L
    Health Policy; 2008 Aug; 87(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18302973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Norwegian National Council for Priority Setting in Health Care: decisions and justifications.
    Wester G; Bringedal B
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2018 Apr; 13(2):118-136. PubMed ID: 28322184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey.
    Mossialos E; King D
    Health Policy; 1999 Oct; 49(1-2):75-135. PubMed ID: 10827292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Priority setting, public opinion and health care system in Spain].
    Costa Font J
    Gac Sanit; 2001; 15(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 11423028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Involving the public in priority setting: a case study using discrete choice experiments.
    Watson V; Carnon A; Ryan M; Cox D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Jun; 34(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 22173912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Looking back and moving forward: On the application of proportional shortfall in healthcare priority setting in the Netherlands.
    Reckers-Droog VT; van Exel NJA; Brouwer WBF
    Health Policy; 2018 Jun; 122(6):621-629. PubMed ID: 29703652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Priority setting and patient adaptation to disability and illness: outcomes of a qualitative study.
    McKie J; Hurworth R; Shrimpton B; Richardson J; Bell C
    Health Care Anal; 2014 Sep; 22(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 23359104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Value judgment of new medical treatments: Societal and patient perspectives to inform priority setting in The Netherlands.
    Nicolet A; van Asselt ADI; Vermeulen KM; Krabbe PFM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235666. PubMed ID: 32645035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stated and Revealed Preferences for Funding New High-Cost Cancer Drugs: A Critical Review of the Evidence from Patients, the Public and Payers.
    MacLeod TE; Harris AH; Mahal A
    Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):201-22. PubMed ID: 26370257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea.
    Lim MK; Bae EY; Choi SE; Lee EK; Lee TJ
    Value Health; 2012; 15(1 Suppl):S91-4. PubMed ID: 22265075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis.
    Sandman L
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 Jun; 7(6):532-541. PubMed ID: 29935130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
    Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Priority setting in the provincial health services authority: survey of key decision makers.
    Teng F; Mitton C; Mackenzie J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 7():84. PubMed ID: 17565691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.