179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28411964)
41. Public Mistrust of the U.S. Health Care System's Profit Motives: Mixed-Methods Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Richmond J; Powell W; Maurer M; Mangrum R; Gold MR; Pathak-Sen E; Yang M; Carman KL
J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1396-1402. PubMed ID: 28875447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Priority setting at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels in Canada, Norway and Uganda.
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Health Policy; 2007 Jun; 82(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 17034898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Research priority setting in kidney disease: a systematic review.
Tong A; Chando S; Crowe S; Manns B; Winkelmayer WC; Hemmelgarn B; Craig JC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 May; 65(5):674-83. PubMed ID: 25582284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.
Sibbald SL; Singer PA; Upshur R; Martin DK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Mar; 9():43. PubMed ID: 19265518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study.
Mielke J; Martin DK; Singer PA
Crit Care Med; 2003 Dec; 31(12):2764-8. PubMed ID: 14668612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?
Shmueli A
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():20. PubMed ID: 28469840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
Fischer F; Lewith G; Witt CM; Linde K; von Ammon K; Cardini F; Falkenberg T; Fønnebø V; Johannessen H; Reiter B; Uehleke B; Weidenhammer W; Brinkhaus B
Forsch Komplementmed; 2014; 21(2):e1-16. PubMed ID: 24851850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Priority setting for high cost medications (HCMs) in public hospitals in Australia: a case study.
Gallego G; Taylor SJ; Brien JA
Health Policy; 2007 Nov; 84(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17618009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Healthcare priority setting in Kenya: a gap analysis applying the accountability for reasonableness framework.
Bukachi SA; Onyango-Ouma W; Siso JM; Nyamongo IK; Mutai JK; Hurtig AK; Olsen OE; Byskov J
Int J Health Plann Manage; 2014; 29(4):342-61. PubMed ID: 23775594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Priority-setting ethics in public health.
Michaelis AP
J Public Health Policy; 2002; 23(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 12532681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting.
Abelson J; Eyles J; McLeod CB; Collins P; McMullan C; Forest PG
Health Policy; 2003 Oct; 66(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 14499168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Determining and broadening the definition of impact from implementing a rational priority setting approach in a healthcare organization.
Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid C; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
Soc Sci Med; 2014 Aug; 114():1-9. PubMed ID: 24887012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Criteria for priority-setting in health care in Uganda: exploration of stakeholders' values.
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF
Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Mar; 82(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 15112005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Fit for purpose? Introducing a rational priority setting approach into a community care setting.
Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid C; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
J Health Organ Manag; 2016 Jun; 30(4):690-710. PubMed ID: 27296887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Priority setting in Swedish health care: are the politicians ready?
Rosén P; De Fine Licht J; Ohlsson H
Scand J Public Health; 2014 May; 42(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 24516064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
Eddama O; Coast J
Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.
James C; Carrin G; Savedoff W; Hanvoravongchai P
Health Care Anal; 2005 Mar; 13(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 15889680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: does the type of health gain matter?
Mason H; Baker R; Donaldson C
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Apr; 16(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 21447843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
