1273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28412436)
1. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography reclassification rate using value distal to lesion compared to lowest value.
Kueh SH; Mooney J; Ohana M; Kim U; Blanke P; Grover R; Sellers S; Ellis J; Murphy D; Hague C; Bax JJ; Nørgaard BL; Rabbat M; Leipsic JA
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 28986147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFR
Patel MR; Nørgaard BL; Fairbairn TA; Nieman K; Akasaka T; Berman DS; Raff GL; Hurwitz Koweek LM; Pontone G; Kawasaki T; Sand NPR; Jensen JM; Amano T; Poon M; Øvrehus KA; Sonck J; Rabbat MG; Mullen S; De Bruyne B; Rogers C; Matsuo H; Bax JJ; Leipsic J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 13(1 Pt 1):97-105. PubMed ID: 31005540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with acute chest pain: Subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT II trial.
Ferencik M; Lu MT; Mayrhofer T; Puchner SB; Liu T; Maurovich-Horvat P; Ghemigian K; Ivanov A; Adami E; Nagurney JT; Woodard PK; Truong QA; Udelson JE; Hoffmann U
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 31113728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Use of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Emergency Department.
Chinnaiyan KM; Safian RD; Gallagher ML; George J; Dixon SR; Bilolikar AN; Abbas AE; Shoukfeh M; Brodsky M; Stewart J; Cami E; Forst D; Timmis S; Crile J; Raff GL
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):452-461. PubMed ID: 31326487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Anatomic vs Functional Index Testing in Patients With Low-Risk Stable Chest Pain.
Karády J; Mayrhofer T; Ivanov A; Foldyna B; Lu MT; Ferencik M; Pursnani A; Salerno M; Udelson JE; Mark DB; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2028312. PubMed ID: 33315111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Tesche C; Bayer RR; Giovagnoli DA; Todd Hudson H; Zhou CS; Yan J; Lu MJ; Zhou F; Lu GM; Jiang JW; Zhang LJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851. PubMed ID: 32462444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFR
Rønnow Sand NP; Nissen L; Winther S; Petersen SE; Westra J; Christiansen EH; Larsen P; Holm NR; Isaksen C; Urbonaviciene G; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Apr; 13(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 31422146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the Routine Availability of CT-Derived FFR Influence Management of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Compared to CT Angiography Alone?: The FFR
Curzen NP; Nolan J; Zaman AG; Nørgaard BL; Rajani R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 27568119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Computed Fractional Flow Reserve Coronary CT Angiography (FFRCT) Offer an Accurate Noninvasive Comparison to Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA)? "The Noninvasive CATH." A Comprehensive Review.
Raja J; Seitz MP; Yedlapati N; Khouzam RN
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 46(3):100642. PubMed ID: 32624193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic and Clinical Value of FFR
Mickley H; Veien KT; Gerke O; Lambrechtsen J; Rohold A; Steffensen FH; Husic M; Akkan D; Busk M; Jessen LB; Jensen LO; Diederichsen A; Øvrehus KA
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 15(6):1046-1058. PubMed ID: 35680213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic Value and Risk Continuum of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from Coronary CT Angiography.
Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Nerlekar N; Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Jensen JM; Kimura T; Shiomi H; Erglis A; Jegere S; Oldroyd KG; Botker HE; Seneviratne SK; Achenbach S; Ko BS
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):343-351. PubMed ID: 31184558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial.
Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trans-lesional fractional flow reserve gradient as derived from coronary CT improves patient management: ADVANCE registry.
Takagi H; Leipsic JA; McNamara N; Martin I; Fairbairn TA; Akasaka T; Nørgaard BL; Berman DS; Chinnaiyan K; Hurwitz-Koweek LM; Pontone G; Kawasaki T; Rønnow Sand NP; Jensen JM; Amano T; Poon M; Øvrehus KA; Sonck J; Rabbat MG; Mullen S; De Bruyne B; Rogers C; Matsuo H; Bax JJ; Douglas PS; Patel MR; Nieman K; Ihdayhid AR
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 34518113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic efficacy of fractional flow reserve with coronary angiography in dual-source computed tomography scanner.
Xia G; Fan D; Yao X; Guan G; Wang J
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28830299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence and predictors of lesion-specific ischemia by FFR
Kitabata H; Leipsic J; Patel MR; Nieman K; De Bruyne B; Rogers C; Pontone G; Nørgaard BL; Bax JJ; Raff G; Chinnaiyan KM; Rabbat M; Rønnow Sand NP; Blanke P; Fairbairn TA; Matsuo H; Amano T; Kawasaki T; Morino Y; Akasaka T
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 29422416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]