These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28412466)

  • 1. Proposed variations of the stepped-wedge design can be used to accommodate multiple interventions.
    Lyons VH; Li L; Hughes JP; Rowhani-Rahbar A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():160-167. PubMed ID: 28412466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
    Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The need to balance merits and limitations from different disciplines when considering the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design.
    de Hoop E; van der Tweel I; van der Graaf R; Moons KG; van Delden JJ; Reitsma JB; Koffijberg H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Oct; 15():93. PubMed ID: 26514920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A practical Bayesian stepped wedge design for community-based cluster-randomized clinical trials: The British Columbia Telehealth Trial.
    Cunanan KM; Carlin BP; Peterson KA
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):641-650. PubMed ID: 27430710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 2. Stepping Up to Routine Public Health Evaluation With the Stepped Wedge Design.
    Spiegelman D
    Am J Public Health; 2016 Mar; 106(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 26885961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial.
    Hargreaves JR; Copas AJ; Beard E; Osrin D; Lewis JJ; Davey C; Thompson JA; Baio G; Fielding KL; Prost A
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():350. PubMed ID: 26279013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power calculation in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial with reduced intervention sustainability effect.
    Li J; Zhang Y; Myers LJ; Bravata DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(4):663-674. PubMed ID: 31317805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review showed that stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials often did not reach their planned sample size.
    Eichner FA; Groenwold RHH; Grobbee DE; Oude Rengerink K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():89-100. PubMed ID: 30458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
    Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 2 × 2 cluster randomized controlled factorial trial design is mainly used for efficiency and to explore intervention interactions: a systematic review.
    Mdege ND; Brabyn S; Hewitt C; Richardson R; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1083-92. PubMed ID: 25063555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power analysis for stepped wedge trials with multiple interventions.
    Sundin P; Crespi CM
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(8):1498-1512. PubMed ID: 35014710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of the statistical methodology used and available.
    Barker D; McElduff P; D'Este C; Campbell MJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():69. PubMed ID: 27267471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reporting quality of stepped wedge design randomized trials: a systematic review protocol.
    Thabane A; Dennis BB; Gajic-Veljanoski O; Paul J; Thabane L
    Clin Epidemiol; 2016; 8():261-6. PubMed ID: 27468249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014.
    Davey C; Hargreaves J; Thompson JA; Copas AJ; Beard E; Lewis JJ; Fielding KL
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():358. PubMed ID: 26278667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multilevel Intervention Stepped Wedge Designs (MLI-SWDs).
    Sperger J; Kosorok MR; Linnan L; Kneipp SM
    Prev Sci; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38748315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials shows that design is particularly used to evaluate interventions during routine implementation.
    Mdege ND; Man MS; Taylor Nee Brown CA; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):936-48. PubMed ID: 21411284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information growth for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a stepped wedge cluster randomized design and unknown intracluster correlation.
    Brown SP; Shoben AB
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 32026713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stepped wedge designs: insights from a design of experiments perspective.
    Matthews JNS; Forbes AB
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3772-3790. PubMed ID: 28786236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.