147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28414086)
1. Deadbeats or losers: Discretionary male parental investment can make females less choosy.
Meacham F; Getty T
J Theor Biol; 2017 Jun; 422():50-58. PubMed ID: 28414086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
Bonduriansky R
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
Sandvik M; Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 267(1458):2151-5. PubMed ID: 11413626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.
Harris WE; Uller T
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 364(1520):1039-48. PubMed ID: 19324609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Should females prefer to mate with low-quality males?
Cotar C; McNamara JM; Collins EJ; Houston AI
J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 18625245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
Kokko H; Johnstone RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
Muniz DG; Machado G
J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
Edward DA; Chapman T
Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 21890230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
Kokko H; Jennions MD
J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females?
Venner S; Bernstein C; Dray S; Bel-Venner MC
Am Nat; 2010 Jun; 175(6):650-61. PubMed ID: 20415532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual signals and mating patterns in Syngnathidae.
Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
J Fish Biol; 2011 Jun; 78(6):1647-61. PubMed ID: 21651521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Males can't afford to be choosy: Male reproductive investment does not influence preference for female size in Limia (Poeciliidae).
Spikes M; Schlupp I
Behav Processes; 2021 Feb; 183():104315. PubMed ID: 33417929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS.
Johnstone RA; Reynolds JD; Deutsch JC
Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1382-1391. PubMed ID: 28565695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection.
MØller Ap; Thornhill R
Anim Behav; 1998 Jun; 55(6):1507-15. PubMed ID: 9641996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.
Moura RR; Gonzaga MO
Naturwissenschaften; 2017 Apr; 104(3-4):28. PubMed ID: 28289773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies.
Barrett LT; Evans JP; Gasparini C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93780. PubMed ID: 24705713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Female mate preference and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had fewer consorts.
Harris WE; Moore PJ
Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S64-71. PubMed ID: 15795863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
