147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28414086)
21. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
Candolin U; Salesto T
Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose.
Alonzo SH
Proc Biol Sci; 2012 May; 279(1734):1784-90. PubMed ID: 22171082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Female choosiness leads to the evolution of individually distinctive males.
Thom MD; Dytham C
Evolution; 2012 Dec; 66(12):3736-42. PubMed ID: 23206132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias.
Seki M; Wakano JY; Ihara Y
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 17448499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of individual state on the strength of mate choice in females and males.
Dougherty LR
Behav Ecol; 2023; 34(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 36998999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Devoted fathers or selfish lovers? Conflict between mating effort and parental care in a harem-defending arachnid.
Alissa LM; Muniz DG; Machado G
J Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 30(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 27758054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Indiscriminate females and choosy males: within- and between-species variation in Drosophila.
Gowaty PA; Steinichen R; Anderson WW
Evolution; 2003 Sep; 57(9):2037-45. PubMed ID: 14575325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes.
Gonzalez-Voyer A; Fitzpatrick JL; Kolm N
Evolution; 2008 Aug; 62(8):2015-26. PubMed ID: 18489718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs (
Feagles O; Höbel G
Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):506-517. PubMed ID: 36150198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do female Nicrophorus vespilloides reduce direct costs by choosing males that mate less frequently?
Hopwood PE; Mazué GP; Carter MJ; Head ML; Moore AJ; Royle NJ
Biol Lett; 2016 Mar; 12(3):20151064. PubMed ID: 26979560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Black widows as plastic wallflowers: female choosiness increases with indicators of high mate availability in a natural population.
Scott CE; McCann S; Andrade MCB
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):8981. PubMed ID: 32488193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Do male house mice (Mus musculus) discriminate between females that differ in nutritional status?
Costello AK; Pultorak JD; Meikle DB
Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19467300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality.
Burley N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1977 Aug; 74(8):3476-9. PubMed ID: 269407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior.
Gowaty PA; Hubbell SP
Integr Comp Biol; 2005 Nov; 45(5):931-44. PubMed ID: 21676844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)?
Klappert K; Reinhold K
Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 17720463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Post-mating sexual selection increases lifetime fitness of polyandrous females in the wild.
Fisher DO; Double MC; Blomberg SP; Jennions MD; Cockburn A
Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7115):89-92. PubMed ID: 17080089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
