BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28414498)

  • 1. Neighing, barking, and drumming horses-object related sounds help and hinder picture naming.
    Mädebach A; Wöhner S; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1629-1646. PubMed ID: 28414498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.
    Mädebach A; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1909-1916. PubMed ID: 29030759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neighing dogs: Semantic context effects of environmental sounds in spoken word production - a replication and extension.
    Brownsett SL; Mascelloni M; Gowlett G; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):1990-2000. PubMed ID: 36301012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic interference is not modality specific: Evidence from sound naming with distractor pictures.
    Wöhner S; Jescheniak JD; Mädebach A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2290-2308. PubMed ID: 32640868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Vieth HE; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(12):2325-39. PubMed ID: 24830335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When Sufficiently Processed, Semantically Related Distractor Pictures Hamper Picture Naming.
    Matushanskaya A; Mädebach A; Müller MM; Jescheniak JD
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Nov; 63(6):307-317. PubMed ID: 28059032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Naming pictures and sounds: Stimulus type affects semantic context effects.
    Wöhner S; Mädebach A; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 May; 47(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 34264729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time-course of the cross-modal semantic modulation of visual picture processing by naturalistic sounds and spoken words.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 24319929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of hearing loss on semantic access by auditory and audiovisual speech in children.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):753-62. PubMed ID: 23782714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 22200912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptation of a semantic picture-word interference paradigm for future language mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation: A behavioural study.
    Jonen M; Heim S; Grünert M; Neuloh G; Sakreida K
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113418. PubMed ID: 34153427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times.
    Bürki A; Madec S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):1019-1046. PubMed ID: 35389697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Costa A; Alario FX; Caramazza A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 15948287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Mahon BZ; Costa A; Peterson R; Vargas KA; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):503-35. PubMed ID: 17470003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory and Semantic Cues Facilitate Decoding of Visual Object Category in MEG.
    Brandman T; Avancini C; Leticevscaia O; Peelen MV
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Mar; 30(2):597-606. PubMed ID: 31216008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Writing words from pictures: what representations are activated, and when?
    Bonin P; Fayol M
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):677-89. PubMed ID: 10946550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1554-68. PubMed ID: 21688942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.