These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28414712)

  • 1. The need for a worldwide consensus for cell line authentication: Experience implementing a mandatory requirement at the International Journal of Cancer.
    Fusenig NE; Capes-Davis A; Bianchini F; Sundell S; Lichter P
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Apr; 15(4):e2001438. PubMed ID: 28414712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendation of short tandem repeat profiling for authenticating human cell lines, stem cells, and tissues.
    Barallon R; Bauer SR; Butler J; Capes-Davis A; Dirks WG; Elmore E; Furtado M; Kline MC; Kohara A; Los GV; MacLeod RA; Masters JR; Nardone M; Nardone RM; Nims RW; Price PJ; Reid YA; Shewale J; Sykes G; Steuer AF; Storts DR; Thomson J; Taraporewala Z; Alston-Roberts C; Kerrigan L
    In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim; 2010 Oct; 46(9):727-32. PubMed ID: 20614197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cell line authentication: a necessity for reproducible biomedical research.
    Souren NY; Fusenig NE; Heck S; Dirks WG; Capes-Davis A; Bianchini F; Plass C
    EMBO J; 2022 Jul; 41(14):e111307. PubMed ID: 35758134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knowledge and debate in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: new sections, new science, and looking forward and outward.
    Duggan CP; Brennan L; Christian P; Fanzo J; Ludwig DS;
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2020 Jan; 111(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 31665209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Widespread Use of Misidentified Cell Line KB (HeLa): Incorrect Attribution and Its Impact Revealed through Mining the Scientific Literature.
    Vaughan L; Glänzel W; Korch C; Capes-Davis A
    Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 77(11):2784-2788. PubMed ID: 28455420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The costs of using unauthenticated, over-passaged cell lines: how much more data do we need?
    Hughes P; Marshall D; Reid Y; Parkes H; Gelber C
    Biotechniques; 2007 Nov; 43(5):575, 577-8, 581-2 passim. PubMed ID: 18072586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenge of making Ophthalmic Research a better journal.
    Cunha-Vaz J
    Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 53(1):1. PubMed ID: 25472734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is
    White A
    Acupunct Med; 2018 Aug; 36(4):267-268. PubMed ID: 29625971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Check your cultures! A list of cross-contaminated or misidentified cell lines.
    Capes-Davis A; Theodosopoulos G; Atkin I; Drexler HG; Kohara A; MacLeod RA; Masters JR; Nakamura Y; Reid YA; Reddel RR; Freshney RI
    Int J Cancer; 2010 Jul; 127(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20143388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Starting January 1, 2004, editors of the Dutch Journal of Medicine; gender identity in front of authors' names in the Journal].
    Rosendaal FR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Feb; 148(8):398-9; author reply 399. PubMed ID: 15032094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Journal policy on research funded by the tobacco industry.
    Godlee F; Malone R; Timmis A; Otto C; Bush A; Pavord I; Groves T
    Thorax; 2013 Dec; 68(12):1090-1. PubMed ID: 24130154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where we publish : an analysis of the publications of German institutes of pathology.
    Fritzsche FR; Dietel M; Kristiansen G
    Virchows Arch; 2008 Apr; 452(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 18188591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Petsavers--funding research projects.
    Martin M
    J Small Anim Pract; 2006 May; 47(5):294. PubMed ID: 16674727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization and authentication of cancer cell lines: an overview.
    Reid YA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 731():35-43. PubMed ID: 21516396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
    Vinther S; Nielsen OH; Rosenberg J; Keiding N; Schroeder TV
    Dan Med J; 2012 Aug; 59(8):A4479. PubMed ID: 22849979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines, position papers and critical reviews: differences and similarities.
    Reiner Ž
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 23258928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How to develop quality indicators in cytology?].
    Garbar C
    Ann Pathol; 2011 Nov; 31(5 Suppl):S32-6. PubMed ID: 22054453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cell line cross-contamination in biomedical research: a call to prevent unawareness.
    Rojas A; Gonzalez I; Figueroa H
    Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2008 Jul; 29(7):877-80. PubMed ID: 18565286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. References in the Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology: are they accurate?
    Panduranga C; Kirtilaxmi KB
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2012; 55(1):135-7. PubMed ID: 22499331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reader reaction and AJIC editorial board response: strategic directions for the journal.
    Olmsted RN
    Am J Infect Control; 2003 Dec; 31(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 14647120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.