These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28414857)

  • 21. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sela HY; Fiegenberg T; Ben-Meir A; Elchalal U; Ezra Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Feb; 142(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 19019528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. External cephalic version at term: A 6-year single-operator experience.
    Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
    Birth; 2019 Dec; 46(4):616-622. PubMed ID: 30941816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.
    Mowat A; Gardener G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Feb; 54(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24359099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [External cephalic version as a possible treatment of breech presentation].
    Giusti M; Bertolotti GC; Nappi RE; Fignon A; Zara C
    Minerva Ginecol; 2000 Jun; 52(6):221-7. PubMed ID: 11085044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
    Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery.
    Salzer L; Nagar R; Melamed N; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 24593778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version.
    Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():178-181. PubMed ID: 30308400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term.
    Fok WY; Chan LW; Leung TY; Lau TK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):748-51. PubMed ID: 16026399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting the success of moxibustion in the management of a breech presentation as a preliminary treatment to external cephalic version.
    Manyande A; Grabowska C
    Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19853333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study.
    Burgos J; Cobos P; Rodríguez L; Osuna C; Centeno MM; Martínez-Astorquiza T; Fernández-Llebrez L
    BJOG; 2014 Jan; 121(2):230-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 24245964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Success rate of external cephalic version in relation to the woman's body mass index and other factors-a population-based cohort study.
    Svensson E; Axelsson D; Nelson M; Nevander S; Blomberg M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Dec; 100(12):2260-2267. PubMed ID: 34622950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Determinants of pain perception after external cephalic version in pregnant women.
    Truijens SE; van der Zalm M; Pop VJ; Kuppens SM
    Midwifery; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e102-7. PubMed ID: 24332750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks.
    Kok M; van der Steeg JW; van der Post JA; Mol BW
    Am J Perinatol; 2011 Feb; 28(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 20661845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
    Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
    BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. External cephalic version of non-cephalic presentation; is it worthwhile?
    Gottvall T; Ginstman C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Dec; 90(12):1443-5. PubMed ID: 21682700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of Success in External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at Term.
    Isakov O; Reicher L; Lavie A; Yogev Y; Maslovitz S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 133(5):857-866. PubMed ID: 30969207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. To ECV or not to ECV? The current evidence base concerning external cephalic version.
    Walker S
    Pract Midwife; 2014 Oct; 17(9):30-3. PubMed ID: 25571703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [External cephalic version in case of persisting breech presentation at term: motivations and women's experience of the intervention].
    Pichon M; Guittier MJ; Irion O; Boulvain M
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013; 41(7-8):427-32. PubMed ID: 23102577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. External cephalic version: first report from Thailand.
    Chanrachakul B; Jaovisidha A; Herabutya Y; Srimanoi M; Puttharuksa J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Mar; 82(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 10410475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.