These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

469 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28416029)

  • 21. A comparison of perinatal outcomes in singletons and multiples born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection stratified for neonatal risk criteria.
    van Heesch MM; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC; van der Hoeven MA; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; van Zonneveld P; Dirksen CD
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Mar; 93(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 24397702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in China: analysis of 15,405 offspring in seven centers (2004 to 2008).
    Yan J; Huang G; Sun Y; Zhao X; Chen S; Zou S; Hao C; Quan S; Chen ZJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jan; 95(1):458-60. PubMed ID: 20850722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assisted reproductive technologies and birth defects.
    Shiota K; Yamada S
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2005 Jun; 45(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 15904430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A population-based study of maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts.
    Schieve LA; Cohen B; Nannini A; Ferre C; Reynolds MA; Zhang Z; Jeng G; Macaluso M; Wright VC;
    Matern Child Health J; 2007 Nov; 11(6):517-25. PubMed ID: 17345154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short and long term outcomes of children conceived with assisted reproductive technology.
    Turkgeldi E; Yagmur H; Seyhan A; Urman B; Ata B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():129-136. PubMed ID: 27846448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Managing the complications associated with assisted reproductive technologies.
    Patchava S; Gelbaya TA; Nardo LG
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 19745799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology.
    Lu YH; Wang N; Jin F
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2013 May; 14(5):359-71. PubMed ID: 23645173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perinatal complications of assisted reproduction.
    Aboulghar MA
    Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 16158467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of assisted reproductive technologies on intra-uterine growth and birth defects in singletons.
    Hansen M; Bower C
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Aug; 19(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 24746981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The prognosis for children born after assisted reproduction].
    Henningsen AK; Loft A; Malchau SS; Pinborg A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2012 Oct; 174(41):2462-6. PubMed ID: 23050688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of chronic hypertension on assisted pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.
    Dayan N; Lanes A; Walker MC; Spitzer KA; Laskin CA
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 26690007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Health of children born after the infertility treatment with Assisted Reproduction Technology].
    Wołczyński S; Zbucka M; Leśniewska M
    Endokrynol Pol; 2005; 56(6):975-9. PubMed ID: 16821222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
    Cheung AP
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.
    Hayashi M; Nakai A; Satoh S; Matsuda Y
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):922-8. PubMed ID: 22763098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects.
    Davies MJ; Moore VM; Willson KJ; Van Essen P; Priest K; Scott H; Haan EA; Chan A
    N Engl J Med; 2012 May; 366(19):1803-13. PubMed ID: 22559061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.