These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28416210)

  • 1. Development of a continuous motorcycle protection barrier system using computer simulation and full-scale crash testing.
    Atahan AO; Hiekmann JM; Himpe J; Marra J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():103-115. PubMed ID: 28416210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility study of airbag concept applicable to motorcycles without sufficient reaction structure.
    Aikyo Y; Kobayashi Y; Akashi T; Ishiwatari M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S148-52. PubMed ID: 26027968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exposure factors of Victoria's active motorcycle fleet related to serious injury crash risk.
    Allen T; McClure R; Newstead SV; Lenné MG; Hillard P; Symmons M; Day L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Nov; 17(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 26980668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An insight into the performance of road barriers - redistribution of barrier-relevant crashes.
    Zou Y; Tarko AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():152-161. PubMed ID: 27529451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Injury typology of fatal motorcycle collisions with roadside barriers in Australia and New Zealand.
    Bambach MR; Grzebieta RH; McIntosh AS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():253-60. PubMed ID: 23036403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rail height effects on safety performance of Midwest Guardrail System.
    Asadollahi Pajouh M; Julin RD; Stolle CS; Reid JD; Faller RK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 28696773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are automatic systems the future of motorcycle safety? A novel methodology to prioritize potential safety solutions based on their projected effectiveness.
    Gil G; Savino G; Piantini S; Baldanzini N; Happee R; Pierini M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Nov; 18(8):877-885. PubMed ID: 28494162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motorcycle safety programmes in Malaysia: how effective are they?
    Radin Umar RS
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2006 Jun; 13(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 16707342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between crash avoidance maneuvers and injury severity sustained by motorcyclists in single-vehicle crashes.
    Wang C; Lu L; Lu J; Wang T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26068308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of motorcycle rider protection systems using numerical techniques.
    Miralbes R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():94-108. PubMed ID: 23792610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Barrier-relevant crash modification factors and average costs of crashes on arterial roads in Indiana.
    Zou Y; Tarko AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():71-85. PubMed ID: 29175634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further development of Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB), what can in-depth studies tell us? A multinational study.
    Savino G; Rizzi M; Brown J; Piantini S; Meredith L; Albanese B; Pierini M; Fitzharris M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S165-72. PubMed ID: 25307383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combined benefits of motorcycle antilock braking systems (ABS) in preventing crashes and reducing crash severity.
    Rizzi M; Kullgren A; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 26098303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic impact of motorcycle helmets: from impact to discharge.
    Eastridge BJ; Shafi S; Minei JP; Culica D; McConnel C; Gentilello L
    J Trauma; 2006 May; 60(5):978-83; discussion 983-4. PubMed ID: 16688058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of factors that increase motorcycle rider risk compared to car driver risk.
    Keall MD; Newstead S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():23-9. PubMed ID: 23036378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of contributing factors between alcohol related single vehicle motorcycle and car crashes.
    Maistros A; Schneider WH; Savolainen PT
    J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():129-35. PubMed ID: 24913477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing car drivers' and motorcyclists' opinions about junction crashes.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():304-317. PubMed ID: 29753219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The protective effect of roadside barriers for motorcyclists.
    Bambach MR; Mitchell RJ; Grzebieta RH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(7):756-65. PubMed ID: 23944155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the accident size of motorcycle-involved crashes: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Kashani AT; Jafari M; Bondarabadi MA; Dabirinejad S
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2021 Mar; 28(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 33054665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.