139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28416642)
1. Estimating the burden of occupational cancer: assessing bias and uncertainty.
Hutchings S; Rushton L
Occup Environ Med; 2017 Aug; 74(8):604-611. PubMed ID: 28416642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention.
Rushton L; Hutchings S; Brown T
Occup Environ Med; 2008 Dec; 65(12):789-800. PubMed ID: 18079154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.
Steenland K; Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 160(4):384-92. PubMed ID: 15286024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
de Vocht F; Kromhout H; Ferro G; Boffetta P; Burstyn I
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Aug; 66(8):502-8. PubMed ID: 19060029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occupational exposure to silica and lung cancer: pooled analysis of two case-control studies in Montreal, Canada.
Vida S; Pintos J; Parent ME; Lavoué J; Siemiatycki J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1602-11. PubMed ID: 20501770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating reduction in occupational disease burden following reduction in exposure.
Armstrong BG; Darnton A
Occup Environ Med; 2008 Sep; 65(9):592-6. PubMed ID: 18096655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment of diesel exhaust and lung cancer: combining human and animal studies after adjustment for biases in epidemiological studies.
Pedeli X; Hoek G; Katsouyanni K
Environ Health; 2011 Apr; 10():30. PubMed ID: 21481231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward risk reduction: predicting the future burden of occupational cancer.
Hutchings S; Rushton L
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 May; 173(9):1069-77. PubMed ID: 21447477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occupational cancer in Britain. Statistical methodology.
Hutchings SJ; Rushton L
Br J Cancer; 2012 Jun; 107 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8-17. PubMed ID: 22710683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological and statistical approaches to predicting human lung cancer risk from silica.
Kuempel ED; Tran CL; Bailer AJ; Porter DW; Hubbs AF; Castranova V
J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2001; 20 Suppl 1():15-32. PubMed ID: 11570671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():1-47. PubMed ID: 18671157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bias and uncertainty of penetrating photon dose measured by film dosemeters in an epidemiological study of US nuclear workers.
Daniels RD; Schubauer-Berigan MK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):275-89. PubMed ID: 15769802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exposure to occupational carcinogens and lung cancer risk. Evolution of epidemiological estimates of attributable fraction.
De Matteis S; Consonni D; Bertazzi PA
Acta Biomed; 2008; 79 Suppl 1():34-42. PubMed ID: 18924308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of exposure in epidemiological studies: the example of silica dust.
Dahmann D; Taeger D; Kappler M; Büchte S; Morfeld P; Brüning T; Pesch B
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 18(5):452-61. PubMed ID: 18059424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables.
Fox MP; Lash TL; Greenland S
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 34(6):1370-6. PubMed ID: 16172102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion.
Jurek AM; Maldonado G; Greenland S; Church TR
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jul; 61(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 17568060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating attributable fraction in partially ecologic case-control studies.
Björk J; Strömberg U
Epidemiology; 2002 Jul; 13(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12094102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Monte Carlo maximum likelihood method for estimating uncertainty arising from shared errors in exposures in epidemiological studies of nuclear workers.
Stayner L; Vrijheid M; Cardis E; Stram DO; Deltour I; Gilbert SJ; Howe G
Radiat Res; 2007 Dec; 168(6):757-63. PubMed ID: 18088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lung cancer risk attributable to occupational exposures in a multicenter case-control study in Central and Eastern Europe.
Olsson AC; Gustavsson P; Zaridze D; Mukeriya A; Szeszenia-Dabrowska N; Rudnai P; Lissowska J; Fabianova E; Mates D; Bencko V; Foretova L; Janout V; Fevotte J; 't Mannetje A; Fletcher T; Brennan P; Boffetta P
J Occup Environ Med; 2011 Nov; 53(11):1262-7. PubMed ID: 22068130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sparse-data bias accompanying overly fine stratification in an analysis of beryllium exposure and lung cancer risk.
Rothman KJ; Mosquin PL
Ann Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 23(2):43-8. PubMed ID: 23219098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
