These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Otoacoustic emissions of full-term and preterm neonates]. Kashiwamura M; Ohwatari R; Satoh N; Kawanami M; Chida E; Sakamoto T; Fukuda S; Inuyama Y Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jan; 99(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 8822259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)]. Hoth S Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Probst R; Harris FP Prog Brain Res; 1993; 97():91-9. PubMed ID: 8234771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Comparison of results from normally hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. Probst R; Harris FP Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1993 Aug; 119(8):858-60. PubMed ID: 8343248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal hearing screening using a smartphone-based otoacoustic emission device: A comparative study. Madzivhandila AG; le Roux T; Biagio de Jager L Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Feb; 177():111862. PubMed ID: 38295684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience. Escobar-Ipuz FA; Soria-Bretones C; García-Jiménez MA; Cueto EM; Torres Aranda AM; Sotos JM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109647. PubMed ID: 31470205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: an alternative test of auditory function in horses. Mc Brearty A; Auckburally A; Pollock PJ; Penderis J Equine Vet J; 2013 Jan; 45(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 22296459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective Hearing Screening Measures: An Exploration of a Suitable Combination for Risk-Based Newborn Hearing Screening. Kanji A; Khoza-Shangase K J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 29863463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Audiology characteristics in newborns and infants who failed in the hearing screening by transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions: 89 cases study]. Huang LH; Deng XQ; Yang YL; Wang SJ; Tang XQ; Guo LS; Han DM Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 21575409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A role for otoacoustic emissions in screening for hearing impairment and middle ear disorders in school-age children. Nozza RJ; Sabo DL; Mandel EM Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 9201458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary descriptions of transient-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions from graduates of an intensive care nursery. Bergman BM; Gorga MP; Neely ST; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Peters J J Am Acad Audiol; 1995 Mar; 6(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 7772784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening? Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Gorga MP; Neely ST; Bergman BM; Beauchaine KL; Kaminski JR; Peters J; Schulte L; Jesteadt W J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2639-48. PubMed ID: 8270740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Newborn hearing screening at a community-based obstetric unit: Screening and diagnostic outcomes. de Kock T; Swanepoel D; Hall JW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 84():124-31. PubMed ID: 27063767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of distortion-product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with ABR threshold shift in chinchillas with ototoxic damage. Kakigi A; Hirakawa H; Harel N; Mount RJ; Harrison RV Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Sep; 25(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 9799987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing screening in the newborn intensive care nursery: comparison of methods. Rhodes MC; Margolis RH; Hirsch JE; Napp AP Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Jun; 120(6):799-808. PubMed ID: 10352430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. White KR; Vohr BR; Maxon AB; Behrens TR; McPherson MG; Mauk GW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 29(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 8056504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]