156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28417170)
1. Reduced dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction compared to standard dose CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in oncology patients: intra-individual comparison study on image quality and lesion conspicuity.
Morimoto LN; Kamaya A; Boulay-Coletta I; Fleischmann D; Molvin L; Tian L; Fisher G; Wang J; Willmann JK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2279-2288. PubMed ID: 28417170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study.
Khawaja RDA; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karosmangulu A; Padole A; Do S; Brown K; Thompson R; Morton T; Raihani N; Koehler T; Kalra MK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25458225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging.
Lubner MG; Pooler BD; Kitchin DR; Tang J; Li K; Kim DH; Munoz del Rio A; Chen GH; Pickhardt PJ
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):2089-102. PubMed ID: 25903700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultra-low-dose lung screening CT with model-based iterative reconstruction: an assessment of image quality and lesion conspicuity.
Ju YH; Lee G; Lee JW; Hong SB; Suh YJ; Jeong YJ
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):553-559. PubMed ID: 28786301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a full model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in 80 kVp ultra-low-dose paranasal sinus CT imaging of pediatric patients.
Sun J; Zhang Q; Duan X; Zhang C; Wang P; Jia C; Liu Y; Peng Y
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 29019028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm in ultralow-dose CT for evaluation of urolithiasis: evaluation of radiation dose reduction, image quality, and diagnostic performance.
Park SB; Kim YS; Lee JB; Park HJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):3137-46. PubMed ID: 26197735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iterative Reconstructions in Reduced-Dose CT: Which Type Ensures Diagnostic Image Quality in Young Oncology Patients?
Pauchard B; Higashigaito K; Lamri-Senouci A; Knebel JF; Berthold D; Verdun FR; Alkadhi H; Schmidt S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 28365232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Vardhanabhuti V; Loader RJ; Mitchell GR; Riordan RD; Roobottom CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 23436843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction.
Wellenberg RHH; van Osch JAC; Boelhouwers HJ; Edens MA; Streekstra GJ; Ettema HB; Boomsma MF
Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1775-1785. PubMed ID: 31016340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
Volders D; Bols A; Haspeslagh M; Coenegrachts K
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):469-74. PubMed ID: 23847252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iterative reconstruction: comparison of techniques for reduced-dose liver computed tomography following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cha MJ; Jeong WK; Choi D; Kim YK; Lim S; Choi SY; Lee WJ
Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 26792822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
