158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28417332)
1. Assessment of the prognostic and discriminating value of the novel bioscore system for breast cancer; a SEER database analysis.
Abdel-Rahman O
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(1):231-236. PubMed ID: 28417332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The assessment of 8th edition AJCC prognostic staging system and a simplified staging system for breast cancer: The analytic results from the SEER database.
Zhang J; Zhao B; Jin F
Breast J; 2019 Sep; 25(5):838-847. PubMed ID: 31192530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the prognostic stage in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer in locally advanced breast cancer: An analysis based on SEER 18 database.
Wang M; Chen H; Wu K; Ding A; Zhang M; Zhang P
Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():56-63. PubMed ID: 29100045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Apr; 20(4):550-556. PubMed ID: 28808860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?
Abdel-Rahman O
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Feb; 17(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29428107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the prognostic value of new sub-stages within the AJCC 8th edition of non-small cell lung cancer.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1414-1420. PubMed ID: 28497423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenging a dogma; AJCC 8th staging system is not sufficient to predict outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Abdel-Rahman O
Lung Cancer; 2017 Nov; 113():128-133. PubMed ID: 29110839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting.
Abdel-Rahman O
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):269-275. PubMed ID: 29143220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. M-bioscore: proposing a new statistical model for prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Abdel-Rahman O
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Sep; 7(9):845-854. PubMed ID: 30192157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma.
Oweira H; Giryes A; Mannhart M; Decker M; Schlumpf R; Abdel-Rahman O
Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 May; 34(5):923-929. PubMed ID: 29448859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the 8th AJCC staging system for gastric cancer in a population-based setting.
Abdel-Rahman O
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 May; 12(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 29198151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the prognostic value of the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with clinically staged prostate cancer; A time to sub-classify stage IV?
Abdel-Rahman O
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188450. PubMed ID: 29182656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Neo-Bioscore Update for Staging Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Incorporation of Prognostic Biologic Factors Into Staging After Treatment.
Mittendorf EA; Vila J; Tucker SL; Chavez-MacGregor M; Smith BD; Symmans WF; Sahin AA; Hortobagyi GN; Hunt KK
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 26986538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the discriminating value of the 8th AJCC stage grouping for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Abdel-Rahman O
HPB (Oxford); 2018 Jan; 20(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 28882455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Prognostic Significance of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in T
Wang M; Wu K; Zhang P; Zhang M; Ding A; Chen H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 30456680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The comparison of the anatomic stage and pathological prognostic stage according to the AJCC 8th edition for the prognosis in Japanese breast cancer patients: data from a single institution.
Tokunaga E; Ijichi H; Tajiri W; Masuda T; Takizawa K; Ueo H; Koga C; Tanaka J; Nakamura Y; Ohno S; Taguchi K; Okamoto M
Breast Cancer; 2020 Nov; 27(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 32472474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staging for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Utility of Incorporating Biologic Factors.
Yi M; Lin H; Bedrosian I; Shen Y; Hunt KK; Chavez-MacGregor M; King TA; Mittendorf EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 31667721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Prognostic Significance of the Prognostic Stage Group According to the Eighth Edition of American Cancer Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Analysis From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 Database.
Luo SP; Wu QS; Chen H; Wang XX; Chen QX; Zhang J; Song CG
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():211-219. PubMed ID: 31706539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic assessment of breast carcinoma submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pathological non-complete response.
Resende U; Cabello C; Ramalho SOB; Zeferino LC
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):601. PubMed ID: 31208353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Eighth AJCC New Substages for Bladder Cancer Among Different Staging Contexts.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e1095-e1106. PubMed ID: 28843376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
