158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28417332)
21. Validation of the pathological prognostic staging system proposed in the revised eighth edition of the AJCC staging manual in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Jang N; Choi JE; Kang SH; Bae YK
Virchows Arch; 2019 Feb; 474(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 30474738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporation of Treatment Response, Tumor Grade and Receptor Status Improves Staging Quality in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Bergquist JR; Murphy BL; Storlie CB; Habermann EB; Boughey JC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3510-3517. PubMed ID: 28828583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the 7th and 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for breast cancer patients: a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Shao N; Xie C; Shi Y; Ye R; Long J; Shi H; Shan Z; Thompson AM; Lin Y
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():1433-1442. PubMed ID: 30863154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Breast Cancer Staging System.
Chavez-MacGregor M; Mittendorf EA; Clarke CA; Lichtensztajn DY; Hunt KK; Giordano SH
Oncologist; 2017 Nov; 22(11):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28592619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Breast Cancer Staging Systems After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Kantor O; Laws A; Pastorello RG; King C; Wong S; Dey T; Schnitt S; King TA; Mittendorf EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7347-7355. PubMed ID: 33956276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Revisiting Dukes' paradigm; some node positive colon cancer patients have better prognosis than some node negative patients.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Jun; 20(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 29086248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modified staging system for pulmonary carcinoids on the basis of lung cancer TNM system.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 May; 20(5):670-677. PubMed ID: 29022170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A simplified breast cancer prognostic score: comparison with the AJCC clinical prognostic staging system.
Fei F; Zhang K; Siegal GP; Wei S
Mod Pathol; 2021 Dec; 34(12):2141-2147. PubMed ID: 34365462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Revisiting the Prognostic Heterogeneity of AJCC Stage IV Carcinomas of the Upper Urinary Tract.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e859-e865. PubMed ID: 29534942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the 8th edition of the American joint committee on cancer's pathological staging system in prognosis assessment and treatment decision making for stage T1-2N1 breast cancer after mastectomy.
Wu SG; Wang J; Lian CL; Lei J; Hua L; Lin Q; Chen YX; He ZY
Breast; 2020 Jun; 51():2-10. PubMed ID: 32172191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.
Jiang W; Zhao B; Li Y; Qi D; Wang D
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1129. PubMed ID: 33225924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The predictive value of the prognostic staging system in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for triple-negative breast cancer: a SEER population-based analysis.
Liu YY; Yu TJ; Liu GY
Future Oncol; 2019 Feb; 15(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 30620221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Overview of breast cancer collaborative stage data items--their definitions, quality, usage, and clinical implications: a review of SEER data for 2004-2010.
Howlader N; Chen VW; Ries LA; Loch MM; Lee R; DeSantis C; Lin CC; Ruhl J; Cronin KA
Cancer; 2014 Dec; 120 Suppl 23():3771-80. PubMed ID: 25412389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validation of the CPS+EG and Neo-Bioscore staging systems after preoperative systemic therapy for breast cancer in a single center in China.
Xu L; Duan X; Zhou B; Liu Y; Ye J; Liu Z; Ma C; Zhang H; Zhang S; Zhang L; Zhao J; Cheng Y
Breast; 2018 Aug; 40():29-37. PubMed ID: 29677568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast has a better long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast in spite of its aggressive clinical presentations: a comparison based on large population database and case-control analysis.
Chen H; Wu K; Wang M; Wang F; Zhang M; Zhang P
Cancer Med; 2017 Dec; 6(12):2775-2786. PubMed ID: 29072365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging provides no better discriminatory ability in prognosis than anatomical staging in triple negative breast cancer.
He J; Tsang JY; Xu X; Li J; Li M; Chao X; Xu Y; Luo R; Tse GM; Sun P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Jan; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 31906874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Burns WR; Frankel TL; Cho CS; Nathan H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):2023-2030. PubMed ID: 28213792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the Incorporation of Recurrence Score into the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Staging System in Patients with T1-2N0M0, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Receptor 2-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
Ding S; Wu J; Lin C; Andriani L; Goh C; Chen W; Li Y; Shen K; Zhu L
Oncologist; 2019 Nov; 24(11):e1014-e1023. PubMed ID: 31019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of survival in non-metastatic inflammatory and other T4 breast cancers: a SEER population-based analysis.
Jiao D; Zhang J; Zhu J; Guo X; Yang Y; Xiao H; Liu Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):138. PubMed ID: 33549037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system provide improved prognostic accuracy in T1-2N1M0 postmastectomy breast cancer patients].
Sun GY; Wang SL; Tang Y; Yang Y; Fang H; Wang JY; Jing H; Zhang JH; Jin J; Song YW; Liu YP; Chen B; Qi SN; Li N; Tang Y; Lu NN; Wang WH; Chen SY; Ren H; Liu XF; Yu ZH; Li YX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 41(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 31434454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
