292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28418343)
1. The Use of Human Epididymis 4 and Cancer Antigen 125 Tumor Markers in the Benign or Malignant Differential Diagnosis of Pelvic or Adnexal Masses.
Dolgun ZN; Kabaca C; Karateke A; İyibozkurt C; İnan C; Altıntaş AS; Karadağ C
Balkan Med J; 2017 Apr; 34(2):156-162. PubMed ID: 28418343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women.
Holcomb K; Vucetic Z; Miller MC; Knapp RC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):358.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21722869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The values of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 and CA(125) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy].
Dong L; Chang XH; Ye X; Zhu LR; Zhao Y; Tian L; Cheng HY; Li XP; Zhang H; Liao QP; Fu TY; Cheng YX; Cui H
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 43(12):931-6. PubMed ID: 19134334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125.
Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Jurkovic D; Neven P; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1706-14. PubMed ID: 18000221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Serum HE4 and diagnosis of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women with adnexal masses.
Gentry-Maharaj A; Burnell M; Dilley J; Ryan A; Karpinskyj C; Gunu R; Mallett S; Deeks J; Campbell S; Jacobs I; Sundar S; Menon U
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):56.e1-56.e17. PubMed ID: 31351062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8750512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. D-dimer as a tumor marker in pre-operative assessment of adnexal masses.
Worasethsin P; Narkwichean A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Nov; 96(11):1395-400. PubMed ID: 24428087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The diagnostic accuracy of two human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) testing systems in combination with CA125 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Lenhard M; Stieber P; Hertlein L; Kirschenhofer A; Fürst S; Mayr D; Nagel D; Hofmann K; Krocker K; Burges A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Sep; 49(12):2081-8. PubMed ID: 21923475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CA 19-9 in evaluation of adnexal mass: retrospective cohort analysis and review of the literature.
Sagi-Dain L; Lavie O; Auslander R; Sagi S
Int J Biol Markers; 2015 Jul; 30(3):e333-40. PubMed ID: 25704505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a multimarker assay for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Chen X; Zhou H; Chen R; He J; Wang Y; Huang L; Sun L; Duan C; Luo X; Yan H
Clin Chim Acta; 2015 Feb; 440():57-63. PubMed ID: 25447698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Van Calster B; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Bourne T; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 19585547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative evaluation and triage of women with suspicious adnexal masses using risk of malignancy index.
Enakpene CA; Omigbodun AO; Goecke TW; Odukogbe AT; Beckmann MW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 19215560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(4):1527-32. PubMed ID: 7654041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Role of Ca-125 in the differential diagnosis of adnexal mass in breast cancer patients].
Grabiec M; Nowicki P; Walentowicz M; Greźlikowska U; Mierzwa T; Chmielewska W
Ginekol Pol; 2005 May; 76(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 16145856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
