These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28418508)

  • 1. Lower Cervical Spine Motion Segment Computational Model Validation: Kinematic and Kinetic Response for Quasi-Static and Dynamic Loading.
    Barker JB; Cronin DS; Nightingale RW
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jun; 139(6):. PubMed ID: 28418508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of in vivo lower cervical spinal loading using musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model during the head flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation.
    Diao H; Xin H; Jin Z
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Nov; 232(11):1071-1082. PubMed ID: 30223718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion analysis study on sensitivity of finite element model of the cervical spine to geometry.
    Zafarparandeh I; Erbulut DU; Ozer AF
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):700-6. PubMed ID: 27107032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical spine segment finite element model for traumatic injury prediction.
    DeWit JA; Cronin DS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jun; 10():138-50. PubMed ID: 22520426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bootstrap prediction bands for cervical spine intervertebral kinematics during in vivo three-dimensional head movements.
    Anderst WJ
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1270-6. PubMed ID: 25798763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. C4-C5 segment finite element model development, validation, and load-sharing investigation.
    Panzer MB; Cronin DS
    J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 19200548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High rotation rate behavior of cervical spine segments in flexion and extension.
    Barker JB; Cronin DS; Chandrashekar N
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Dec; 136(12):121004. PubMed ID: 25070575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of cervical spinal instability under physiologic loading.
    Ng HW; Teo EC; Lee KK; Qiu TX
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Feb; 16(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 12571486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings.
    McDonald CP; Bachison CC; Chang V; Bartol SW; Bey MJ
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 20359957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion.
    Ren D; Hu Z; Yuan W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E410-5. PubMed ID: 26583468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical testing simulation of a cadaver spine specimen: development and evaluation study.
    Ahn HS; DiAngelo DJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):E330-6. PubMed ID: 17495766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison between the Range of Movement Canine Real Cervical Spine and Numerical Simulation - Computer Model Validation].
    Srnec R; Horák Z; Sedláček R; Sedlinská M; Krbec M; Nečas A
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(2):133-137. PubMed ID: 28809631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of dimensional scaling using cervical spine motion segment finite element models.
    Singh D; Cronin DS
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 28205412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of varying compressive loading methods on physiologic motion patterns in the cervical spine.
    Bell KM; Yan Y; Debski RE; Sowa GA; Kang JD; Tashman S
    J Biomech; 2016 Jan; 49(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 26708967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental flexion/extension data corridors for validation of finite element models of the young, normal cervical spine.
    Wheeldon JA; Pintar FA; Knowles S; Yoganandan N
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 16321642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilevel Validation of a Male Neck Finite Element Model With Active Musculature.
    Barker JB; Cronin DS
    J Biomech Eng; 2021 Jan; 143(1):. PubMed ID: 32696042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of novel angled cervical disc replacement on facet joint stress].
    Bai C; Zhang W; Ling W; Tian Z; Dang X; Wang K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 22568314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation.
    Barrey C; Rousseau MA; Persohn S; Campana S; Perrin G; Skalli W
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S155-65. PubMed ID: 25845316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Female Ligamentous Cervical Spine Finite Element Model Validated for Physiological Loads.
    Östh J; Brolin K; Svensson MY; Linder A
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Jun; 138(6):061005. PubMed ID: 26974520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.