These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419481)
1. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation. Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inherent versus induced protein flexibility: Comparisons within and between apo and holo structures. Clark JJ; Benson ML; Smith RD; Carlson HA PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jan; 15(1):e1006705. PubMed ID: 30699115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conformational and dynamics changes induced by bile acids binding to chicken liver bile acid binding protein. Eberini I; Guerini Rocco A; Ientile AR; Baptista AM; Gianazza E; Tomaselli S; Molinari H; Ragona L Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1889-98. PubMed ID: 18175325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An unconventional ligand-binding mechanism of substrate-binding proteins: MD simulation and Markov state model analysis of BtuF. Wang D; Weng J; Wang W J Comput Chem; 2019 May; 40(14):1440-1448. PubMed ID: 30747434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling Binding with Large Conformational Changes: Key Points in Ensemble-Docking Approaches. Motta S; Bonati L J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jul; 57(7):1563-1578. PubMed ID: 28616990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2. Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induced-fit or preexisting equilibrium dynamics? Lessons from protein crystallography and MD simulations on acetylcholinesterase and implications for structure-based drug design. Xu Y; Colletier JP; Jiang H; Silman I; Sussman JL; Weik M Protein Sci; 2008 Apr; 17(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 18359854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape. Basciu A; Malloci G; Pietrucci F; Bonvin AMJJ; Vargiu AV J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 30883122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computation of the Protein Conformational Transition Pathway on Ligand Binding by Linear Response-Driven Molecular Dynamics. Punia R; Goel G J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 May; 18(5):3268-3283. PubMed ID: 35484642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Free-energy landscapes of protein domain movements upon ligand binding. Kondo HX; Okimoto N; Morimoto G; Taiji M J Phys Chem B; 2011 Jun; 115(23):7629-36. PubMed ID: 21608983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ligand binding remodels protein side-chain conformational heterogeneity. Wankowicz SA; de Oliveira SH; Hogan DW; van den Bedem H; Fraser JS Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35312477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. McGovern SL; Shoichet BK J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms for allosteric activation of protease DegS by ligand binding and oligomerization as revealed from molecular dynamics simulations. Lu C; Stock G; Knecht V Proteins; 2016 Nov; 84(11):1690-1705. PubMed ID: 27556733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement. Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching the conformational complexity and binding properties of HDAC6 through docking and molecular dynamic simulations. Sixto-López Y; Bello M; Rodríguez-Fonseca RA; Rosales-Hernández MC; Martínez-Archundia M; Gómez-Vidal JA; Correa-Basurto J J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 Oct; 35(13):2794-2814. PubMed ID: 27589363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening. Sun Z; Wakefield AE; Kolossvary I; Beglov D; Vajda S Structure; 2020 Feb; 28(2):223-235.e2. PubMed ID: 31810712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deciphering Cryptic Binding Sites on Proteins by Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics. Kimura SR; Hu HP; Ruvinsky AM; Sherman W; Favia AD J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jun; 57(6):1388-1401. PubMed ID: 28537745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applying molecular dynamics simulations to identify rarely sampled ligand-bound conformational states of undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase, an antibacterial target. Sinko W; de Oliveira C; Williams S; Van Wynsberghe A; Durrant JD; Cao R; Oldfield E; McCammon JA Chem Biol Drug Des; 2011 Jun; 77(6):412-20. PubMed ID: 21294851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]