361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419481)
1. Are induced fit protein conformational changes caused by ligand-binding predictable? A molecular dynamics investigation.
Gao C; Desaphy J; Vieth M
J Comput Chem; 2017 Jun; 38(15):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28419481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding.
Gunasekaran K; Nussinov R
J Mol Biol; 2007 Jan; 365(1):257-73. PubMed ID: 17059826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inherent versus induced protein flexibility: Comparisons within and between apo and holo structures.
Clark JJ; Benson ML; Smith RD; Carlson HA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jan; 15(1):e1006705. PubMed ID: 30699115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conformational and dynamics changes induced by bile acids binding to chicken liver bile acid binding protein.
Eberini I; Guerini Rocco A; Ientile AR; Baptista AM; Gianazza E; Tomaselli S; Molinari H; Ragona L
Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1889-98. PubMed ID: 18175325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An unconventional ligand-binding mechanism of substrate-binding proteins: MD simulation and Markov state model analysis of BtuF.
Wang D; Weng J; Wang W
J Comput Chem; 2019 May; 40(14):1440-1448. PubMed ID: 30747434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling Binding with Large Conformational Changes: Key Points in Ensemble-Docking Approaches.
Motta S; Bonati L
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jul; 57(7):1563-1578. PubMed ID: 28616990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.
Ding X; Hayes RL; Vilseck JZ; Charles MK; Brooks CL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 28884249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induced-fit or preexisting equilibrium dynamics? Lessons from protein crystallography and MD simulations on acetylcholinesterase and implications for structure-based drug design.
Xu Y; Colletier JP; Jiang H; Silman I; Sussman JL; Weik M
Protein Sci; 2008 Apr; 17(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 18359854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Holo-like and Druggable Protein Conformations from Enhanced Sampling of Binding Pocket Volume and Shape.
Basciu A; Malloci G; Pietrucci F; Bonvin AMJJ; Vargiu AV
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Apr; 59(4):1515-1528. PubMed ID: 30883122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computation of the Protein Conformational Transition Pathway on Ligand Binding by Linear Response-Driven Molecular Dynamics.
Punia R; Goel G
J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 May; 18(5):3268-3283. PubMed ID: 35484642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Free-energy landscapes of protein domain movements upon ligand binding.
Kondo HX; Okimoto N; Morimoto G; Taiji M
J Phys Chem B; 2011 Jun; 115(23):7629-36. PubMed ID: 21608983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ligand binding remodels protein side-chain conformational heterogeneity.
Wankowicz SA; de Oliveira SH; Hogan DW; van den Bedem H; Fraser JS
Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35312477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.
McGovern SL; Shoichet BK
J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms for allosteric activation of protease DegS by ligand binding and oligomerization as revealed from molecular dynamics simulations.
Lu C; Stock G; Knecht V
Proteins; 2016 Nov; 84(11):1690-1705. PubMed ID: 27556733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement.
Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Searching the conformational complexity and binding properties of HDAC6 through docking and molecular dynamic simulations.
Sixto-López Y; Bello M; Rodríguez-Fonseca RA; Rosales-Hernández MC; Martínez-Archundia M; Gómez-Vidal JA; Correa-Basurto J
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 Oct; 35(13):2794-2814. PubMed ID: 27589363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure-Based Analysis of Cryptic-Site Opening.
Sun Z; Wakefield AE; Kolossvary I; Beglov D; Vajda S
Structure; 2020 Feb; 28(2):223-235.e2. PubMed ID: 31810712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deciphering Cryptic Binding Sites on Proteins by Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics.
Kimura SR; Hu HP; Ruvinsky AM; Sherman W; Favia AD
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jun; 57(6):1388-1401. PubMed ID: 28537745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applying molecular dynamics simulations to identify rarely sampled ligand-bound conformational states of undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase, an antibacterial target.
Sinko W; de Oliveira C; Williams S; Van Wynsberghe A; Durrant JD; Cao R; Oldfield E; McCammon JA
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2011 Jun; 77(6):412-20. PubMed ID: 21294851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
