These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419481)
21. Energy penalties enhance flexible receptor docking in a model cavity. Kamenik AS; Singh I; Lak P; Balius TE; Liedl KR; Shoichet BK Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34475217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Conformational transitions upon ligand binding: holo-structure prediction from apo conformations. Seeliger D; de Groot BL PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000634. PubMed ID: 20066034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mapping myeloperoxidase to identify its promiscuity properties using docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Ramírez-Durán LA; Rosales-Hernández MC; Hernández-Rodríguez M; Mendieta-Wejebe JE; Trujillo-Ferrara J; Correa-Basurto J Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(12):2204-15. PubMed ID: 23016839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Unraveling the Conformational Landscape of Ligand Binding to Glucose/Galactose-Binding Protein by Paramagnetic NMR and MD Simulations. Unione L; Ortega G; Mallagaray A; Corzana F; Pérez-Castells J; Canales A; Jiménez-Barbero J; Millet O ACS Chem Biol; 2016 Aug; 11(8):2149-57. PubMed ID: 27219646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. Smith GR; Sternberg MJ; Bates PA J Mol Biol; 2005 Apr; 347(5):1077-101. PubMed ID: 15784265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Insights into molecular interactions between CaM and its inhibitors from molecular dynamics simulations and experimental data. González-Andrade M; Rodríguez-Sotres R; Madariaga-Mazón A; Rivera-Chávez J; Mata R; Sosa-Peinado A; Del Pozo-Yauner L; Arias-Olguín II J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2016; 34(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 25702612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of active designs of cephalosporin C acylase by molecular dynamics simulation and molecular docking. Li Q; Huang X; Zhu Y J Mol Model; 2014 Jul; 20(7):2314. PubMed ID: 24935111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Investigation of the influence of external factors on the conformational dynamics of rhodopsin-like receptors by means of molecular dynamics simulation. Novikov GV; Sivozhelezov VS; Kolesnikov SS; Shaitan KV J Recept Signal Transduct Res; 2014 Apr; 34(2):104-18. PubMed ID: 24495290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. AHoJ-DB: A PDB-wide Assignment of apo & holo Relationships Based on Individual Protein-Ligand Interactions. Feidakis CP; Krivak R; Hoksza D; Novotny M J Mol Biol; 2024 Sep; 436(17):168545. PubMed ID: 38508305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ligand-Induced Flap Conformational Changes in Cathepsin-D-A Comparative Study. Arodola OA; Soliman ME J Cell Biochem; 2016 Nov; 117(11):2643-57. PubMed ID: 27038253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Quantitative Measure of Conformational Changes in Apo, Holo and Ligand-Bound Forms of Enzymes. Singh S; Singh AK; Wadhwa G; Singh DB; Dwivedi S; Gautam B; Ramteke PW Interdiscip Sci; 2016 Jun; 8(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 26260067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Crystal structure analysis, covalent docking, and molecular dynamics calculations reveal a conformational switch in PhaZ7 PHB depolymerase. Kellici TF; Mavromoustakos T; Jendrossek D; Papageorgiou AC Proteins; 2017 Jul; 85(7):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 28370478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modeling and selection of flexible proteins for structure-based drug design: backbone and side chain movements in p38 MAPK. Subramanian J; Sharma S; B-Rao C ChemMedChem; 2008 Feb; 3(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 18081134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles. Lorber DM; Shoichet BK Protein Sci; 1998 Apr; 7(4):938-50. PubMed ID: 9568900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Molecular Dynamics-Markov State Model of Protein Ligand Binding and Allostery in CRIB-PDZ: Conformational Selection and Induced Fit. Thayer KM; Lakhani B; Beveridge DL J Phys Chem B; 2017 Jun; 121(22):5509-5514. PubMed ID: 28489401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations. Liu K; Watanabe E; Kokubo H J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 28074360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures. Guterres H; Park SJ; Jiang W; Im W J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Jan; 61(1):535-546. PubMed ID: 33337877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Pipeline To Enhance Ligand Virtual Screening: Integrating Molecular Dynamics and Fingerprints for Ligand and Proteins. Spyrakis F; Benedetti P; Decherchi S; Rocchia W; Cavalli A; Alcaro S; Ortuso F; Baroni M; Cruciani G J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Oct; 55(10):2256-74. PubMed ID: 26355717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Probing the structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis MbtA: model validation using molecular dynamics simulations and docking studies. Maganti L; Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium ; Ghoshal N J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2014; 32(2):273-88. PubMed ID: 23527569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]