These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419605)

  • 1. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Electrical modification suggesting transmurality is faster achieved with remote magnetic catheter in comparison with contact force use.
    Bun SS; Ayari A; Latcu DG; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 28(7):745-753. PubMed ID: 28419605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact force and force-time integral in atrial radiofrequency ablation predict transmurality of lesions.
    Squara F; Latcu DG; Massaad Y; Mahjoub M; Bun SS; Saoudi N
    Europace; 2014 May; 16(5):660-7. PubMed ID: 24798957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Catheter-tissue contact force determines atrial electrogram characteristics before and lesion efficacy after antral pulmonary vein isolation in humans.
    Kumar S; Chan M; Lee J; Wong MC; Yudi M; Morton JB; Spence SJ; Halloran K; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 24102727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
    Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters.
    Winkle RA; Moskovitz R; Hardwin Mead R; Engel G; Kong MH; Fleming W; Salcedo J; Patrawala RA; Tranter JH; Shai I
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Jun; 52(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29460232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Yuan S; Holmqvist F; Kongstad O; Jensen SM; Wang L; Ljungström E; Hertervig E; Borgquist R
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 25213917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of contact force and remote magnetic navigation on lesion formation for the ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Grossi S; Grassi F; Galleani L; Bianchi F; Conte MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 41(5):450-458. PubMed ID: 29405314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
    Matsuda H; Parwani AS; Attanasio P; Huemer M; Wutzler A; Blaschke F; Haverkamp W; Boldt LH
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 26498938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
    Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical outcomes of magnetically navigated rotor ablation as an adjunct to conventional pulmonary vein isolation.
    Shukla G; Zimmerman J; Shir Z; Shah R; Hasanaj E
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii40-ii47. PubMed ID: 29722856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact force sensing for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A randomized, multicenter trial.
    Conti S; Weerasooriya R; Novak P; Champagne J; Lim HE; Macle L; Khaykin Y; Pantano A; Verma A
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Feb; 15(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 29030237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With or Without Contact Force Sensing.
    Hussein AA; Barakat AF; Saliba WI; Tarakji KG; Bassiouny M; Baranowski B; Tchou P; Bhargava M; Dresing T; Callahan T; Cantillon D; Kanj M; Lindsay BD; Wazni OM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 28(5):483-488. PubMed ID: 28185351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 24443504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lin H; Chen YH; Hou JW; Lu ZY; Xiang Y; Li YG
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(9):994-1005. PubMed ID: 28569422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does a patent foramen ovale matter when using a remote-controlled magnetic system for pulmonary vein isolation?
    Gate-Martinet A; Da Costa A; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Feb; 107(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 24556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
    Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
    Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.