These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419605)

  • 21. Unipolar electrogram-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: electrogram patterns and outcomes.
    Fu G; He B; Wang B; Liu J; Yu Y; Du X; Feng M; Gao F; Jin H; Fang R; Chu H
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2019 Apr; 54(3):203-208. PubMed ID: 30327991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lin C; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 28862806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Stabile G; Solimene F; Calò L; Anselmino M; Castro A; Pratola C; Golia P; Bottoni N; Grandinetti G; De Simone A; Schillaci V; Bertaglia E; De Ponti R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 25378035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.
    Knecht S; Reichlin T; Pavlovic N; Schaer B; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 25925494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force-Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study.
    Reddy VY; Dukkipati SR; Neuzil P; Natale A; Albenque JP; Kautzner J; Shah D; Michaud G; Wharton M; Harari D; Mahapatra S; Lambert H; Mansour M
    Circulation; 2015 Sep; 132(10):907-15. PubMed ID: 26260733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contact-force guided single-catheter approach for pulmonary vein isolation: Feasibility, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
    Pambrun T; Combes S; Sousa P; Bloa ML; El Bouazzaoui R; Grand-Larrieu D; Thompson N; Martin R; Combes N; Boveda S; Haïssaguerre M; Albenque JP
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):331-338. PubMed ID: 27940124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter.
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Seegers J; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 20009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Jin Q; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 44(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 26216480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation efficacy using remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation with contact-force control.
    Jez J; Jadczyk T; Lehar F; Pesl M; Kulik T; Belaskova S; Soucek F; Caluori G; Wojakowski W; Starek Z
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2020 Dec; 164(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 31645769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.
    Jin QI; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen XU
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 26969219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Nakagawa H; Kautzner J; Natale A; Peichl P; Cihak R; Wichterle D; Ikeda A; Santangeli P; Di Biase L; Jackman WM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 6(4):746-53. PubMed ID: 23873143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lee G; Hunter RJ; Lovell MJ; Finlay M; Ullah W; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Europace; 2016 Feb; 18(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 26318548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the relationship between contact force and left atrial scar formation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Sohns C; Karim R; Harrison J; Arujuna A; Linton N; Sennett R; Lambert H; Leo G; Williams S; Razavi R; Wright M; Schaeffter T; O'Neill M; Rhode K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 24118197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Wall thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial junction rather than electrical information as the major determinant of dormant conduction after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation.
    Iso K; Okumura Y; Watanabe I; Nagashima K; Sonoda K; Kogawa R; Sasaki N; Takahashi K; Kurokawa S; Nakai T; Ohkubo K; Hirayama A
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Sep; 46(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 27221713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Higher contact-force values associated with better mid-term outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using the SmartTouch™ catheter.
    Providência R; Marijon E; Combes S; Bouzeman A; Jourda F; Khoueiry Z; Cardin C; Combes N; Boveda S; Albenque JP
    Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results.
    Vassallo F; Cunha C; Serpa E; Meigre LL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Lovatto CV; Batista W; Serpa R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1877-1883. PubMed ID: 31397522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Catheter Contact Force on Human Left Atrial Electrogram Characteristics in Sinus Rhythm and Atrial Fibrillation.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Ling LH; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Oct; 8(5):1030-9. PubMed ID: 26152560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results.
    Marijon E; Fazaa S; Narayanan K; Guy-Moyat B; Bouzeman A; Providencia R; Treguer F; Combes N; Bortone A; Boveda S; Combes S; Albenque JP
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 24433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of Contact Force Technology on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Shurrab M; Di Biase L; Briceno DF; Kaoutskaia A; Haj-Yahia S; Newman D; Lashevsky I; Nakagawa H; Crystal E
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Sep; 4(9):e002476. PubMed ID: 26391136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.