These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419702)

  • 1. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC): mechanical and collimation checks.
    Barnes MP; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):56-66. PubMed ID: 28419702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC) geometric checks for daily IGRT geometric accuracy quality assurance.
    Barnes MP; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 May; 18(3):200-206. PubMed ID: 28332342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
    Barnes MP; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):139-150. PubMed ID: 28291921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Machine Performance Check application for TrueBeam Linac.
    Clivio A; Vanetti E; Rose S; Nicolini G; Belosi MF; Cozzi L; Baltes C; Fogliata A
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():97. PubMed ID: 25896341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent validation of machine performance check for the Halcyon and TrueBeam linacs for daily quality assurance.
    Li Y; Netherton T; Nitsch PL; Gao S; Klopp AH; Balter PA; Court LE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):375-382. PubMed ID: 30016578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Daily QA of linear accelerators using only EPID and OBI.
    Sun B; Goddu SM; Yaddanapudi S; Noel C; Li H; Cai B; Kavanaugh J; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5584-94. PubMed ID: 26429233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multi-institutional evaluation of machine performance check system on treatment beam output and symmetry using statistical process control.
    Binny D; Aland T; Archibald-Heeren BR; Trapp JV; Kairn T; Crowe SB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 20(3):71-80. PubMed ID: 30786139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automating linear accelerator quality assurance.
    Eckhause T; Al-Hallaq H; Ritter T; DeMarco J; Farrey K; Pawlicki T; Kim GY; Popple R; Sharma V; Perez M; Park S; Booth JT; Thorwarth R; Moran JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):6074-83. PubMed ID: 26429282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the truebeam machine performance check (MPC): OBI X-ray tube alignment procedure.
    Barnes MP; Pomare D; Menk FW; Moraro B; Greer PB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):68-78. PubMed ID: 30178521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT deliveries.
    Agnew A; Agnew CE; Grattan MW; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):N49-63. PubMed ID: 24732210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing quality assurance of multi-leaf collimator using the structural similarity index.
    Zhang H; Zhang B; Lasio G; Chen S; Nasehi Tehrani J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 25(4):e14288. PubMed ID: 38345201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term experience of MPC across multiple TrueBeam linacs: MPC concordance with conventional QC and sensitivity to real-world faults.
    Pearson M; Eaton D; Greener T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):224-235. PubMed ID: 32790139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.
    Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Hindmarsh J; Lim SB; Lovelock DM; Fuangrod T; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 28564208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is a weekly qualitative picket fence test sufficient? A proposed alternate EPID-based weekly MLC QA program.
    Kalavagunta C; Xu H; Zhang B; Mossahebi S; MacFarlane M; Jiang K; Lee SW; Chen S; Sawant A; Gopal A; Yi B
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13699. PubMed ID: 35856943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic detection of MLC relative position errors for VMAT using the EPID-based picket fence test.
    Christophides D; Davies A; Fleckney M
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8340-8359. PubMed ID: 27811392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An EPID-based method to determine mechanical deformations in a linear accelerator.
    Gourdeau D; Gingras L; Beaulieu F; Leclerc G; Archambault L
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5054-5065. PubMed ID: 30242848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid acceptance testing of modern linac using on-board MV and kV imaging systems.
    Yaddanapudi S; Cai B; Harry T; Dolly S; Sun B; Li H; Stinson K; Noel C; Santanam L; Pawlicki T; Mutic S; Goddu SM
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3393-3406. PubMed ID: 28432806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of QA software system analysis for the static picket fence test.
    Boudet J; Aubignac L; Beneux A; Mazoyer F; Bessieres I
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13618. PubMed ID: 35570379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check.
    Stambaugh C; Yancey J; Shukla U; Melhus C; Stambaugh N
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e35695. PubMed ID: 37012967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.