2153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419750)
1. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy.
Moro C; Štromberga Z; Raikos A; Stirling A
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):549-559. PubMed ID: 28419750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of virtual reality anatomy models to prosections in station-based anatomy teaching.
Ail G; Freer F; Chan CS; Jones M; Broad J; Canale GP; Elston P; Leeney J; Vickerton P
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):763-769. PubMed ID: 38584323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Zhao J; Xu X; Jiang H; Ding Y
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 32334594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: Exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education.
Maresky HS; Oikonomou A; Ali I; Ditkofsky N; Pakkal M; Ballyk B
Clin Anat; 2019 Mar; 32(2):238-243. PubMed ID: 30295333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy.
Stepan K; Zeiger J; Hanchuk S; Del Signore A; Shrivastava R; Govindaraj S; Iloreta A
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2017 Oct; 7(10):1006-1013. PubMed ID: 28719062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Augmented Versus Virtual Reality in Education: An Exploratory Study Examining Science Knowledge Retention When Using Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality Mobile Applications.
Huang KT; Ball C; Francis J; Ratan R; Boumis J; Fordham J
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Feb; 22(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 30657334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breaking with Tradition: A Scoping Meta-Analysis Analyzing the Effects of Student-Centered Learning and Computer-Aided Instruction on Student Performance in Anatomy.
Wilson AB; Brown KM; Misch J; Miller CH; Klein BA; Taylor MA; Goodwin M; Boyle EK; Hoppe C; Lazarus MD
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Jan; 12(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 29659155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual Reality-Based Head-Mounted Devices for Medical Education: Systematic Review.
Barteit S; Lanfermann L; Bärnighausen T; Neuhann F; Beiersmann C
JMIR Serious Games; 2021 Jul; 9(3):e29080. PubMed ID: 34255668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load.
Küçük S; Kapakin S; Göktaş Y
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Oct; 9(5):411-21. PubMed ID: 26950521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.
Bork F; Stratmann L; Enssle S; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):585-598. PubMed ID: 30697948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementing virtual reality technology to teach medical college systemic anatomy: A pilot study.
Liao ML; Yeh CC; Lue JH; Chang MF
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 38487974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using virtual reality to complement and enhance anatomy education.
Erolin C; Reid L; McDougall S
J Vis Commun Med; 2019 Jul; 42(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 31057001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between student engagement with online content and achievement in a blended learning anatomy course.
Green RA; Whitburn LY; Zacharias A; Byrne G; Hughes DL
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):471-477. PubMed ID: 29236359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy.
Khot Z; Quinlan K; Norman GR; Wainman B
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 23509000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model.
Chen S; Zhu J; Cheng C; Pan Z; Liu L; Du J; Shen X; Shen Z; Zhu H; Liu J; Yang H; Ma C; Pan H
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):395. PubMed ID: 33129310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual Reality in Anatomy: A Pilot Study Evaluating Different Delivery Modalities.
Birbara NS; Sammut C; Pather N
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Jul; 13(4):445-457. PubMed ID: 31587471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving Academic Performance of Sport and Exercise Science Undergraduate Students in Gross Anatomy Using a Near-Peer Teaching Program.
Viana RB; Campos MH; Santos DAT; Xavier ICM; Vancini RL; Andrade MS; de Lira CAB
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Jan; 12(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 29659165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The skeletons in our closet: E-learning tools and what happens when one side does not fit all.
Van Nuland SE; Rogers KA
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):570-588. PubMed ID: 28575530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting.
Barmaki R; Yu K; Pearlman R; Shingles R; Bork F; Osgood GM; Navab N
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 30648818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
