152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28419901)
1. Does exclusion of cancers registered only from death-certificate information diminish socio-demographic disparities in recorded survival?
Tervonen HE; Roder D; Morrell S; You H; Currow DC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():70-77. PubMed ID: 28419901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Socio-demographic disadvantage and distant summary stage of cancer at diagnosis--A population-based study in New South Wales.
Tervonen HE; Walton R; Roder D; You H; Morrell S; Baker D; Aranda S
Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 40():87-94. PubMed ID: 26703888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1995 Mar; 71(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 7880750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in impact of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status on cancer stage and survival by level of socio-economic disadvantage and remoteness of residence-A population-based cohort study in Australia.
Tervonen HE; Aranda S; Roder D; Walton R; Baker D; You H; Currow D
Cancer Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 41():132-8. PubMed ID: 26953842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact on colorectal cancer survival of cases registered by 'death certificate only': implications for national survival rates.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 1994 Dec; 70(6):1229-31. PubMed ID: 7981082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restriction to period of interest improves informative value of death certificate only proportions in period analysis of cancer survival.
Brenner H; Jansen L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1432-9. PubMed ID: 25881488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Death certificate only proportions should be age adjusted in studies comparing cancer survival across populations and over time.
Brenner H; Castro FA; Eberle A; Emrich K; Holleczek B; Katalinic A; Jansen L;
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Jan; 52():102-8. PubMed ID: 26682869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancer survival disparities worsening by socio-economic disadvantage over the last 3 decades in new South Wales, Australia.
Tervonen HE; Aranda S; Roder D; You H; Walton R; Morrell S; Baker D; Currow DC
BMC Public Health; 2017 Sep; 17(1):691. PubMed ID: 28903750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mixed linear model controlling for case underascertainment across multiple cancer registries estimated time trends in survival.
Dahm S; Bertz J; Barnes B; Kraywinkel K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():111-121. PubMed ID: 29329676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determinants and interpretation of death certificate only proportions in the initial years of newly established cancer registries.
Brenner H; Jansen L
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 49(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 23084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Proportion of Death Certificate Only Cases and Its Related Factors, Kwangju Cancer Registry (KCR).
Lee SJ; Shin MH; Kim SY; Park KS; Kim YJ; Hwang TJ; Choi JS
Cancer Res Treat; 2001 Dec; 33(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 26680831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimates.
Robinson D; Sankila R; Hakulinen T; Møller H
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Mar; 43(5):909-13. PubMed ID: 17300929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deriving valid population-based cancer survival estimates in the presence of nonnegligible proportions of cancers notified by death certificates only.
Brenner H; Holleczek B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Dec; 20(12):2480-6. PubMed ID: 21960691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Less pitfalls and variation in population based cancer survival comparisons within the European Union: Lessons from colorectal cancer patients in neighbouring regions in Denmark and Germany - The Fehmarn Belt project.
Storm HH; Engholm G; Pritzkuleit R; Kejs AM; Katalinic A; Dunst J; Holländer NH
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1188-98. PubMed ID: 25483784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data quality at the Bulgarian National Cancer Registry: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.
Dimitrova N; Parkin DM
Cancer Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 39(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 25914137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of cases with unknown stage prostate cancer in a population-based cancer registry.
Luo Q; Yu XQ; Cooke-Yarborough C; Smith DP; O'Connell DL
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 24103424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing DCO registrations through electronic matching of cancer registry data and routine hospital data.
Pollock AM; Vickers N
Br J Cancer; 2000 Feb; 82(3):712-7. PubMed ID: 10682687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in cancer survival by area-level socio-economic disadvantage: A population-based study using cancer registry data.
Afshar N; English DR; Blakely T; Thursfield V; Farrugia H; Giles GG; Milne RL
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228551. PubMed ID: 31999795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer Incidence in Older Adults in the United States: Characteristics, Specificity, and Completeness of the Data.
Weir HK; Sherman R; Yu M; Gershman S; Hofer BM; Wu M; Green D
J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(3):150-160. PubMed ID: 33584972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
